Democratic Senator Maxine Waters Spills the Beans

#5
#5
She is as much the spokesperson for the Democratic party as David Duke is for the Republicans.
 
#6
#6
lawgator1 said:
She is as much the spokesperson for the Democratic party as David Duke is for the Republicans.
Click to expand...

Duke is currently in the US House of Reps and able to vote on legislation affecting all Americans?
 
#7
#7
utvolpj said:
Duke is currently in the US House of Reps and able to vote on legislation affecting all Americans?
Click to expand...


Irrelevant to my point. No one of any significance within the Democratic party takes direction or advice from her, just as no one in the Republican party looks to Duke for leadership.
 
#10
#10
lawgator1 said:
That doesn't mean she represents or speaks for the Democratic party, which is what the thread/original post suggested.
Click to expand...

Much of the current democrat agenda does indeed look to be socialist, how is this incorrect?
 
#11
#11
i think it's safe to say she has far more power than david duke. she is also on the house finance committie which is very prestigious. pretty scary actually.
 
#12
#12
KB5252 said:
Much of the current democrat agenda does indeed look to be socialist, how is this incorrect?
Click to expand...

That was not the insinuation of original post. It suggested that whatever Maxine Waters says is somehow officially representative of the Democratic party, which is flatly untrue.


droski said:
i think it's safe to say she has far more power than david duke. she is also on the house finance committie which is very prestigious. pretty scary actually.
Click to expand...


Still irrelevant. Just because she is in Congress or is on a certain committee does not in any sense mean that what she says is attirbutable to the party as a whole or to other particular members.

That she is more powerful than Duke does not mean that she is AS powerful as suggested by the original post.
 
#13
#13
lawgator1 said:
Still irrelevant. Just because she is in Congress or is on a certain committee does not in any sense mean that what she says is attirbutable to the party as a whole or to other particular members.

That she is more powerful than Duke does not mean that she is AS powerful as suggested by the original post.
Click to expand...

how did she get on those committees? Surely the Dem leadership sees some value in having her rep their party in the meetings. Now if Duke was on the race relations committee....
 
#14
#14
lawgator1 said:
Still irrelevant. Just because she is in Congress or is on a certain committee does not in any sense mean that what she says is attirbutable to the party as a whole or to other particular members.

That she is more powerful than Duke does not mean that she is AS powerful as suggested by the original post.
Click to expand...

if her views were dramatically different from the democratic party i very much doubt she'd have the power she currently has.
 
#16
#16
lawgator1 said:
That was not the insinuation of original post. It suggested that whatever Maxine Waters says is somehow officially representative of the Democratic party, which is flatly untrue.





Still irrelevant. Just because she is in Congress or is on a certain committee does not in any sense mean that what she says is attirbutable to the party as a whole or to other particular members.

That she is more powerful than Duke does not mean that she is AS powerful as suggested by the original post.
Click to expand...

Very funny considering your past assertions that Rush, Hannity and the like represented the republican party.
 
#18
#18
KB5252 said:
Very funny considering your past assertions that Rush, Hannity and the like represented the republican party.
Click to expand...


Rush and Hannity have infinitely more influence over Republican policy and philosophy than Waters does over Democratic policy and philosophy. Not even close.
 
#19
#19
lawgator1 said:
Rush and Hannity have infinitely more influence over Republican policy and philosophy than Waters does over Democratic policy and philosophy. Not even close.
Click to expand...

Waters doesn't need to "influence" the democrat party. She represents the party, especially the Congressional Black Caucus, to a (wo)man, that entire group is Marxist.

in other words, Waters is the rule, not the exception.
 
#20
#20
lawgator1 said:
Rush and Hannity have infinitely more influence over Republican policy and philosophy than Waters does over Democratic policy and philosophy. Not even close.
Click to expand...

you are honestly arguing that a radio host has "infinitely" more influence than an actual elected congresswoman who sits on some of the most influencial committies in congress? :lolabove:
 
#21
#21
lawgator1 said:
Rush and Hannity have infinitely more influence over Republican policy and philosophy than Waters does over Democratic policy and philosophy. Not even close.
Click to expand...

Rush and Hannity may have more influence over the general public, but they don't cast votes as Waters does. They are talking heads, she has the ears of those that matter not the general public.
 
#22
#22
lawgator1 said:
She is as much the spokesperson for the Democratic party as David Duke is for the Republicans.
Click to expand...

What is she saying that is not consistent with the actions of the Democratic Party? Have you been under a rock the past 6 months?
 
#24
#24
lawgator1 said:
Oh, yes.
Click to expand...

then thank God for Rush and Hannity being able to put a stop to the socialization of the US healthcare system.

If not for their efforts, the stimulus bill would have passed and it's commensurate tax increases would be harming job growth. Without them, the omnibus spending package would have contained thousands of pork barrell earmarks...

oh...wait...
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top