gsvol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2008
- Messages
- 14,179
- Likes
- 10
Don't you think it would be prudent to wait until the charges that are filed against these men are either dropped or the case has run it's course?
NO I DO NOT!
All charges should be dropped.
They risked their lives to capture the leader of the attack that killed these
American civilian contractors and instead of a medal they get a prosecution???
I have more use for a foaming at the mouth rabid dog than I do a present day Democrat, at least with the dog you can shoot it and put it out of it's misery while protecting innocent children but with democrats all you can do is try to expose what a lousy, two-timing, double-dealing, back-stabbing pack of thieves and liars they really are.
I have more use for a foaming at the mouth rabid dog than I do a present day Democrat, at least with the dog you can shoot it and put it out of it's misery while protecting innocent children but with democrats all you can do is try to expose what a lousy, two-timing, double-dealing, back-stabbing pack of thieves and liars they really are.
All the more reason to shoot the guy immediately. He's an American killing terrorist. We should simply be able to kill him without having to explain to anyone why.
Appearances for whom exactly?
I understand what you're saying, but I think there's a line between enemy soldiers and terrorists.I agree with the sentiment, but someone has to uphold the international laws of war and American soldiers have to live by the code of conduct. While it seems unfair to our soldiers and overly humane to the enemy, there is a point at which the bad guys are no longer combatants. If we are going to discard the current laws of war, we need to discard them all. In total war, you might see some slippery slope, but in this case we simply shouldn't.
to be fair, the SEALs themselves requested courts marshal as opposed to Article 15s.