Ohio Vol
Inquisitor of Offense
- Joined
- Jun 9, 2006
- Messages
- 3,057
- Likes
- 128
For the last 12 years, UT has struggled year in and year out with every aspect of the offensive line. My own comments about the long-deposed Jimmy Ray Stephens and Greg Adkins are still all over the boards, and I believe I voiced my opposition to James Cregg and Harry Hiestand before their charges ever took the field in a game.
Living in Ohio, I see plenty of the MAC and from the rest of the teams in the region (and a couple years out of coaching also allows more free time). So I've seen a good deal of Central Michigan and Cincinnati with Don Mahoney coaching the offensive lines of each. And I have really liked what I've seen.
Reasons:
- Downfield blocking. For years we've seen potential big plays get stopped five yards downfield because the line isn't getting to the second level. CMU and Cincy both were able to consistently spring big plays by getting the line past the first level.
- Movement. The line has generally moved well enough to provide running backs with average athleticism (but good vision) the chance to make plays.
- Tenacity. I'm a proponent of "if you block the wrong guy, at least block him out of the play". If you must be wrong, be wrong at top speed and in an ill mood. CMU and Cincy were both known for this.
This stands in sharp contrast to what we've seen basically every year since 1999 or 2000. Gone will be the days of a three-step drop by necessity, or of the ol' grab-and-twist, or of whacking a DL and then standing around confused about what to do.
Living in Ohio, I see plenty of the MAC and from the rest of the teams in the region (and a couple years out of coaching also allows more free time). So I've seen a good deal of Central Michigan and Cincinnati with Don Mahoney coaching the offensive lines of each. And I have really liked what I've seen.
Reasons:
- Downfield blocking. For years we've seen potential big plays get stopped five yards downfield because the line isn't getting to the second level. CMU and Cincy both were able to consistently spring big plays by getting the line past the first level.
- Movement. The line has generally moved well enough to provide running backs with average athleticism (but good vision) the chance to make plays.
- Tenacity. I'm a proponent of "if you block the wrong guy, at least block him out of the play". If you must be wrong, be wrong at top speed and in an ill mood. CMU and Cincy were both known for this.
This stands in sharp contrast to what we've seen basically every year since 1999 or 2000. Gone will be the days of a three-step drop by necessity, or of the ol' grab-and-twist, or of whacking a DL and then standing around confused about what to do.