Dr. allegedly used weed killer on cancer patients...

#2
#2
I think they ought to charge them with aggravated assault and put them away.
 
#4
#4
(VolunteerHillbilly @ Dec 21 said:
what if it worked?

I have a sneaking suspicion that research was not first and foremost on their minds . . .

 
#6
#6
Supposedly no side affects have been found with the patients.

In other words we cannot release the findings till trial.
 
#7
#7
(OrangeEmpire @ Dec 21 said:
Supposedly no side affects have been found with the patients.

In other words we cannot release the findings till trial.

Yeah, I don't know what to make of that.

It seems to me that even if there were no side effects, the patients weren't HELPED which to me is just as serious an issue.
 
#8
#8
How do we know they were not helped? Maybe this is a legitimate treatment. Innocent until proven guilty byond a reasonable doubt. You people are the same types who prejudged O.J. and Michael Jackson.
 
#9
#9
VolunteerHillbilly
How do we know they were not helped? Maybe this is a legitimate treatment. Innocent until proven guilty byond a reasonable doubt. You people are the same types who prejudged O.J. and Michael Jackson.

Yep your right! :wacko: It was in the latest medical health journal.

P.S. Bell County Kool-Aid cures the rheumatism!
 
#12
#12
Are you shure he did not just give them some killer weed? Sometimes these things get misinterpreted.

:bow: :bow: :bow: :bow: :bow: :bow: :bow: :bow: :bow: :bow: :mf_surrender:
 

VN Store



Back
Top