ESPNs mock WNBA draft doesnt even mention Shanna Zolman.

#4
#4
Hate it for her and I really liked her as a player, but she has too many liabilities. She is slow. She isn't a good ball handler. She isn't a good passer. She has, at best, adequate defense. She is a very streaky shooter. Even in women's basketball, straight up 3 point shooters usually don't do a whole lot in the pros.
 
#7
#7
I always compared her to JJ Redick from what I saw of her... excellent shooter, but not much more. Couldn't imagine Redick having to run the point like she had to though.
 
#8
#8
I just couldn't believe Tye'sha Fluker would be taken before Shanna. :dunno:
 
#9
#9
I guess in the women's game shooters are a dime a dozen, but size is at a premium.
 
#10
#10
(GAVol @ Mar 30 said:
I guess in the women's game shooters are a dime a dozen, but size is at a premium.
Click to expand...

Maybe she'll go in the second or third round. :cross:
 
#13
#13
Has there ever been a woman leave school early for the WNBA? I wonder where Candace would be drafted if she went?
 
#15
#15
That's unbelievable to think it hasn't happened when you look at men's basketball.

Almost makes you think there's a rule against it or something.
 
#16
#16
There's really no demand for a women's player to leave early. I don't follow women's ( or men's) pro basketball. I just lose interest after they leave UT.
 
#17
#17
Whattaya mean no demand?

I say that because most of the male players that do it openly claim to be doing it for the money so they can feed their poor family... surely there's a surpemely talented lady or two in the same situation?
 
#18
#18
(tidwell @ Mar 30 said:
Whattaya mean no demand?

I say that because most of the male players that do it openly claim to be doing it for the money so they can feed their poor family... surely there's a surpemely talented lady or two in the same situation?
Click to expand...

I don't think there are impoverished families pinning their hopes and dreams on WNBA careers. Except for the elite players, the money's not there like it is for the men.
 
#19
#19
That's true. Not only the substantially less money, but the fact the WNBA is probably gonna go under... then what?
 
#20
#20
I don't think David Stern will let that happen. If they've subsidized it this long . . .
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top