matts42012
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 3, 2007
- Messages
- 7,182
- Likes
- 8,727
Second thought is that although each player made the decision for himself, each made the decision with a clear understanding of where they fit in the coach's plans.
Third thought is that Bennett can graduate, "un-retire" and play his fourth year pretty much someplace that wants him more.
I don't know about Thomas, but Bennett made his decision knowing that Serrano's plan for him for next year was to have him anchor the lineup.
Bennett battled multiple injuries this season and hey limited the times he could go. When he was physically able to play, he played. When he couldn't, he sat.
He's not going to "unretire" and go somewhere else. He's done. He did a 15-minute interview on SportsTalk this afternoon where he laid out the whole situation and his decisionmaking process. He wants to move on and start the next phase of his life, doing internships that will help him in the job market, and graduate and start his career. I assume they'll post it on their site soon. I encourage anyone who thinks he was run off to listen to it.
Deer Park,
Do you know if "anchor the lineup" included being the full-time starting catcher?
I wasn't implying he was run off. However, not many players who are happy with their situations and confident about their team's prospects suddenly decide internships are more important than baseball after their junior year. It sort of sounds like the polite explanation offered by beleaguered coaches who step down to "spend more time with their family." Maybe the full interview will explain how an internship will open more doors than being a top player on his home town team.
Deer Park,
Thanks for the link. I was struck most by his lack of any definite plans other than just to see what's out there beyond baseball and a general desire to find a chance to be of service to people. The internship issue only came up in the last minute or so. When asked what he'd do with his summer, Ethan said he had a job at an outdoor store and was on the lookout for internships.
When I read your summary ("start the next phase of his life, doing internships that will help him in the job market, and graduate and start his career"), it sounded like a polite cover explanation because it would really be news if a top athlete decided playing baseball at UT was inconsistent with his goals of graduating and getting a job. So I'm glad it wasn't that.
Having heard the interview, I do think the situation is some reflection on the team, either the command climate or his role or his assessment of what one more year would be like. When I've had good employees leave, if they were quitting to pursue another opportunity and leaving was clearly taking them a step closer to their goals, I'd thank them for their service, wish them well and tell them the door would be open if things didn't work out. However, if they were just leaving because they were tired or frustrated or burnt out, and didn't seem to have a well thought out next step, I'd try to work something out, maybe give them some time off or ask them just to stay on until they knew they were going forward to something, rather than just getting away from something that wasn't going well for them at the time.
Ethan's interview sounded like someone in that second category. Seems to me that if I were a coach and one of my top hitters came to me at the end of the season saying, as Ethan did in his interview, that his heart just wasn't in it and he wanted to experience some of "normal" life outside baseball, I'd encourage him not to make a final decision while his body was still sore and his his heart still heavy from the disappointing season. Maybe Coach Serrano did all that and more. I hope so.
I wish Ethan and Blake the best.
So one way or the other this has to be Serrano's fault? I mean...you're kinda all over the place man. First Serrano is cutthroat. Then after the podcast was given to you, Serrano should have given him time off, so it's still Serrano's fault. LMAO
Rich,
What's comical is all the true believers and orange kool-aid drinkers who don't get even a little bit curious about a very unusual sequence of events.
Players leave all the time, but starting players seldom leave just before their senior year unless there's a reason. But here we have a popular, respected, and capable player who decides he's not coming back. And the school orchestrates a public relations rollout to make it seem normal.
First, the Tweets:
"The #Vols wish the best of luck to true #VFLs Ethan Bennett & @Bthom29 who have both decided to hang up the cleats and move on from baseball."
"Both Ethan and Blake have decided to focus on completing their degrees at the University of Tennessee and pursue other career interests."
"Join us in wishing Ethan Bennett and @Bthom29 the best of luck! They are and will always be #VFLs!"
Then the drive time interview, where it turns out Ethan doesn't really have any other plans. He's going to work at an outdoor store and keep his eye open for internships. Uh, Ethan, if you want to look for an internship, maybe you should apply in the spring like everyone else.
We have players leave early all the time. There were stern press releases for guys who messed up (Toles and Blount) and acclaim for the guys who played out their eligibility (Osborne, Godley, etc.) or got drafted (Steckenrider). But has the school ever given such a sendoff for a guy who quit because his "heart just wasn't in it"? No. Normal, growing up, moving on, greener pasture departures aren't news. Until this time. Which makes attentive people wonder if there might be some news here other than what we're being fed.
But I'm "all over the place" because I have the nerve to say it seems peculiar? Fine.
I understand where you're coming from. You've stated your belief that last year's freshman class is going to lead us to the promised land as soon as they grow up, and that takes a special degree of gullibility once you get past Jackson, Stewart, Simcox, and maybe a couple others. But c'mon. Can't you apply any critical thinking to obviously prettied up official stories?
I don't think there's any big scandal or anything. However, I do think Ethan's "heart just wasn't in it" when he told his interviewers how awesome and amazing everything is in the program he's leaving early.
Rich,
Here's what you said
March 4th:
"The upper classmen were not SEC quality for the most part. These freshman are SEC quality for the most part...they're just freshman."
March 3rd:
"Most of the older guys he let go from last year were not upper tier SEC players. Many of the players he brought in are, they're just young. "
March 2nd:
"I know it sounds crazy or moral victory-ish, but the team is young. Serrano has made a good career winning games like this, so I'm not gonna foolishly blame him (not that you are). I'm gonna chalk it up to youth. That being said, this team will be beastly by this time next year."
Less than 3 months ago you thought "most" of the freshmen are SEC quality and "many" are "upper tier SEC players" who will lead a "beastly" team next year. Have you changed your mind?
DeerPark,
Any guesses why people don't take things at face value? Maybe it's because the SID folks relentlessly try to spin every story in a positive light. Look at the individual game stories for the losses: nearly every one has a positive subhead that is irrelevant to the story line of the game or the significance of the event.
For example, the final game at Arkansas where we got blown out and left town with our Hoover hopes seriously damaged. The fine UT journalism interns wrote the following headline:
"Vols Drop Series Finale at No. 14 Arkansas
Zach Luther records pinch-hit RBI single"
We lost 10-2. Our pitching totally failed. And none of that mattered because they were determined to find something, anything, positive about the game. So they lead with a pinch hit that happened long after the game was decided?
The day before, we also got blown out, ant the headline was:
"UT Falls 11-1 as #14 Arkansas Evens Series
Christin Stewart finishes 2-for-2 with a walk and a double"
Right. The big story that day was Christin's good day at the plate. Who thinks this blatant slanting is fooling anyone?
And then there is the endless stream of upbeat tweets about irrelevant stats (e.g., Stewart being the first frosh to lead team in RBI's in a while) that make bad news (nobody on the team had 30 RBI's) sound positive.
The UT sports information department is so consistently, predictably, and ridiculously upbeat about bad sports news that sometimes I think I'm reading the Onion.
So spare us your wounded innocence act because it is entirely in the realm of possibility that your employer would try to spin Ethan's departure. It's what they do.
It's a perfectly natural reaction for fans to read UT positive press releases and try to figure out the real story because we can be pretty certain the official version has been prettied up. It's what we've been trained to do because it's the only way to make sense of what we read.
And I suppose it's over-analyzing on my part to notice that in all your indignant defense, you still didn't answer my question about whether Ethan's likely role as an anchor of the lineup involved being the starting catcher.
You find an SID office in the country that spits out anything other than positive stats and then we'll have a conversation. That applies to college and pro teams.
What do you want them to say? Do you want UT to be the only team in the country that openly says their team stinks? They're not a media organization. Positive spin is what media relations people do.
If this was a player being asked to move on, it would have been handled like every other one was last season, by simply deleting the name from the roster. But Serrano and UT wanted the public to know how much they valued what Ethan gave to the program. And for handling it like that, people want to read into it. I just don't get it.
I don't know what he was promised as position, but I know that Ethan wasn't making a decision on whether to give up on the game based on whether he was going to be the starting catcher.
The problem with your "everybody does it" defense is it's not true.
Not one of these teams tried to slant the loss or the story line or the resulting situation in any way. Now what do you suppose would have happened if UT had earned the twelfth seed and lost in the first round? Don't you think the odds are pretty good the story would have been all about the historic return to Hoover, the progress of the rebuilding effort, and the great effort by the Vols?
One of the things I appreciate about Coach Serrano is that he lays it out pretty straight in his postgame interviews. If the team played poorly and he didn't like the effort or attitude, he says so. If he can say, "We're just not very good right now," why can't the sports information office?