Ethiopia

[gsvol]

Weekend Libertarian: Feral Muslim Mobs Seek Christian Blood

In a politically-correct media culture,
what they call a “religion of peace” is
often sheltered from critical-thinking
questions.

One example: Recently, in Ethiopia hundreds
of Muslim radicals were sentenced for mob
attacks on Christians. But the story doesn’t
help the Left so it has been ceremonially
downplayed or hidden by numerous campaigning
newspapers.

The following Reuters report was buried in
The New York Times:

A court has sentenced 558 people to prison
terms ranging from six months to 25 years for
attacks on Christians that displaced thousands
and led to the burning of 69 churches.

Mobs of Muslim youths attacked (Christians)
near the town of Asendabo in March after
rumors circulated that desecrated pages of
the Koran had been found at a church
construction site.
------------------------------------

The contagion is real and spread by clerics
and Islamist-first abuse excusers, secure in
their sheltered media outlets, no doubt.

Sometimes, passive aggressive actions work
well in private situations: turn the other
cheek. But the mob must be confronted. It’s
why Jesus physically threatened some feral
groups, and why he urged his disciples to
carry swords. All men must take safety
seriously, because the elite media
doesn’t.

 

[Rasputin_Vol]

What the Muslims are doing to Africa is far more devastating than any thing the "white man" has done, yet, the media doesn't seem to want to report it. You have slavery still going on in some portions of East Africa.

 

[gsvol]

What the Muslims are doing to Africa is far more devastating than any thing the "white man" has done, yet, the media doesn't seem to want to report it. You have slavery still going on in some portions of East Africa.

In west Africa also, in Mauritania for instance close
to a million black Africans live as slaves to Arab and
Berber moslems.

Historically the fact is that moslems took many more
African slaves over a much longer period of time than
the number who were shipped to the Americas.

Not only that, they were far more brutal, castration
of males was the rule rather than the exception.

Here is what one black African had to say:

The late Southern Sudanese leader John Garang,
in 1999, posed the following dual-part existential
question for our era: "Is the call for jihad against
a particular people a religious right of those calling
for it, or is it a human rights violation against the
people upon whom jihad is declared and waged?"

Sadly we have represented on this board too many
who stress the religious rights angle and gloss over
the human rights violations on a daily basis, and are
none too polite about it either.

Here is a little jewel I just ran accross:

Prominent Egyptian Preacher: Islam Prefers Strong, Immoral Men | Breaking news and opinion on The Blaze

According to Translating Jihad, the Egyptian leader
quotes Imam Ahmad, Ibn Taymiyya, and the Prophet
Muhammad in making his case. Here are some text
snippets:

If there are two men, and one of them is stronger
spiritually, while the other is stronger physically,
(the latter) is more beneficial to that nation. In war,
for example, the strong man offers his courage,
even if he is immoral or licentious. The weak man
(only) offers his impotence, even if he is faithful…

The Prophet (peace be upon him), said…
”Allah will support this religion through an
immoral man.”