Everything you ever wanted to know about the fake BC.

#5
#5
gs, if Marco Rubio is selected for VP, are you birther-types going to make an issue of both of his parents being native Cubans? Which means that he is not, technically, a natural-born citizen of the US?

if not, why not?
 
#6
#6
gs, if Marco Rubio is selected for VP, are you birther-types going to make an issue of both of his parents being native Cubans? Which means that he is not, technically, a natural-born citizen of the US?

if not, why not?

Doesn't matter the origin of your parents. If you are born on American soil, then you are technically a natural born citizen.

Rubio would be a great choice for VP. Can't hardly see him with Perry though. I would love to see a Romney-Rubio, Romney-Huntsman or Huntsman-Rubio ticket. If Perry gets the nomination, I won't be voting
 
#7
#7
Doesn't matter the origin of your parents. If you are born on American soil, then you are technically a natural born citizen.

Rubio would be a great choice for VP. Can't hardly see him with Perry though. I would love to see a Romney-Rubio, Romney-Huntsman or Huntsman-Rubio ticket. If Perry gets the nomination, I won't be voting

the birther movement is currently crowing about Obama's father being a Kenyan citizen, I'm just asking gs for some clarification.

thank you for playing
 
#8
#8
MG1968

... if Marco Rubio is selected for VP, are you birther-types going to make an issue of both of his parents being native Cubans? Which means that he is not, technically, a natural-born citizen of the US?

if not, why not?

Not sure about the constitutional requirment for VP.

We have had at least 3 presidents assassinated, at least
2 die in office and at least 1 resign, in which case the
VP took over the office, what if it were to go to the
third in line, the speaker of the house?

I would have to read the constitutional title to answer
your question, I think it only stipulates that the president
must be 'a natural born citizen' to be elected to office.

Not sure what you refer to as 'my type,' I am merely
reporting the facts.

One fact is that the latest COLB released by the Obama
crowd in obviously a fake. Look at the line that states
'race.' It says 'African', not in 1961 or any time since has
Hawaii used African to denote race.

They might have used negro then or African American later
but never at any time have they ever used just the word
African.

Anyone has to be incredibly stupid to believe the document
isn't a fake but if it is so real then let's have it produced in
court, something Obama has spent millions to avoid.

And that is just one of many reasons to point out that the
cocument in question is as bogus as it gets.

But then some people will believe anything.

More on the Obama myth:

Articles: Even Republicans Rejected Info About Obama's Past

What would you do if you knew that the top
Democrat running for president was lying about
his past?


That is the question I was faced with in 2008. I had met the
young Barack Obama while he was a sophomore at Occidental
College, and I knew that his commitment to socialism was deep,
genuine, and longstanding.
-------------------------

The Obama I knew was nothing like the lifelong pragmatic
centrist that he was pretending to be in the 2008 presidential
campaign. When I talked politics with the young Obama, he
expressed a profound commitment to bringing about a socialist
economic system in the U.S. -- completely divorced from the
profit motive -- which would occur, in his lifetime, through a
potentially violent, Communist-style revolution.
-------------------------------

Nevertheless, I think there is something broken in our media
and campaign system. I do not think most independents or
conservatives understand, or fully appreciate, the tremendous
advantages the left derives from having the mainstream media
serve as the fully paid, completely sympathetic, Dan Rather-level
opposition research team of the Democratic Party. It is a system
that methodically ignores damaging information about flawed
candidates like Sen. John Edwards and Rep. Anthony Weiner,
while elevating minor errors among Republicans to the status of
Watergate investigations.

Nothing is more glaringly obvious than operation 'fast and
furious' and the Obama constitutional qualification question.

a619e893e7a0fcaf19247110.L._SL500_AA300_.jpg


In a 1984 book [New Lies for Old], ex-KGB Major Anatoliy Golitsyn
predicted the liberalization of the Soviet Bloc and claimed that it
would be a strategic deception. ..."

"Golitsyn's argument was that beginning in about 1960, the Soviet
Union embarked on a strategy of massive long-range strategic
deception which would span several decades and result in the
destruction of Western capitalism and the erection of a communist
world government."

7123XXMXARL._SL500_AA300_.gif


"Golitsyn published his second book, The Perestroika Deception,
after the Soviet Union was dissolved in 1991. This book contained
further analysis of the liberalization, in addition to previously
classified memoranda submitted by Golitsyn to the CIA. The two
books must be read together to get a complete picture of Golitsyn's
thesis."

Archived-Articles: Did Communism Fake Its Own Death in 1991?

ps; obviously belairhead hasn't read the supreme court rulings on
the definition of 'natural born citizen.'

Then too, there are two afadavits on file in one court case in
which credible sources who interviewed Obama's grandmother who
swore that he was born in Kenya and that she was present at
the birth.

There are other issues as well that need to be aired in court
to determine the truth of all these matters.
 

VN Store



Back
Top