In your example, Team 1 is the underdog by 3.5 points.What is the difference between this.
Team 1 is +3.5
Team 2 is -3.5.
Isn't that the same thing?
For example, if Tenn is +14.5 against Arky, but Arky is -14.5. Hu
You will sometimes see something like "-110" quoted with the "spread." This means that for each $1 bet, you must put up an extra 10 cents (or ten percent of your bet) in commission. You will get the twice your bet plus the commission if you win. If you lose, then you lose your bet and the commission.What is the difference between this.
Team 1 is +3.5
Team 2 is -3.5.
Isn't that the same thing?
For example, if Tenn is +14.5 against Arky, but Arky is -14.5. Huh?
Yes, it is the same thing.What is the difference between this.
Team 1 is +3.5
Team 2 is -3.5.
Isn't that the same thing?
For example, if Tenn is +14.5 against Arky, but Arky is -14.5. Huh?
Sometimes I see betting lines by the same book where +/- are interspersed in their list of games. Why the inconsistencies?Yes, it is the same thing.
Some books will only show one those lines since kind of redundant to show both. If one team is a 14.5 point favorite (-14.5 after their name) then the other team is obviously a 14.5 point underdog (+14.5 after their name).
Some books will display the point spread by whichever team is the home team. Depending on if the home team is the favorite or the underdog, you'll see a + or a - after the team name. For example, using 2 of this week's games:Sometimes I see betting lines by the same book where +/- are interspersed in their list of games. Why the inconsistencies?
Pseudoexample:
Tenn +14.5
PSU -2.5
ISU -8.5
TSU +5.5
I also laugh at the use of .5 so there can be no ties.
I really hate that gameday covers it at all, yet alone has that "expert" who is consistently under 50%.Does it upset anyone else that one cannot find news about college football without having to see it through the lense of gambling? I have nothing against gambling but sports coverage should be about sports, not the gambling odds. There should be seperate resources for that.
If you watch the DET / HOU baseball game on right now, they have the odds of winning on screen in real time with the pitch count/score/inning, etc.Does it upset anyone else that one cannot find news about college football without having to see it through the lense of gambling? I have nothing against gambling but sports coverage should be about sports, not the gambling odds. There should be seperate resources for that.