Forced Gay Dates: Diversity Works!

[Tenacious D]

I think that homosexuals have been discrimated against for far too long (just as African Americans are, as well), and think its sad that so many gays remain either closeted or ashamedly confused about their repressed sexual identities.

That's why I support any legal measure that would require every person of consenting age who applies for a marriage license to be required to first show proof that they had at least explored whatever latent homosexual desires they may have repressed.

Namely, being required to show proof of their having dated any member of the same sex for a minimum of 6 months, and providing photographic evidence of their most intimate moments - before being allowed to wed anyone, of either orientation.

If we're going to correct this situation - then let's do it! All at once.

 

[VOLatile]

 

[Tenacious D]

Of course I'm serious!

Think of it as the sexual equivalent of the NFL's "Rooney Rule". Or, affirmative action in its highest and purest form.

Let's get this fabulously ***hsia train on the tracks - today!
Posted via VolNation Mobile

 

[IPorange]

Huh. I guess rbroyles was right about you.

 

[VOLatile]

What'd Rbroyles say about him?

 

[IPorange]

That he's gay.

 

[Hound]

:gone:

 

[VOLatile]

That he's gay.

I see. Nothing wrong with that, then.

 

[Tenacious D]

That he's gay.

So what if I was? Don't judge me.

Save the sermon for the pulpit, Rev. Falwell.
Posted via VolNation Mobile

 

[kptvol]

Tenacious should be our next President.
Posted via VolNation Mobile

 

[bamacheats]

Oh! I get it now, Tenacious "D". I always thought that the "D" stood for "defense". Now I know what kind of Tenacious "D" that you like.
Posted via VolNation Mobile

 

[Tenacious D]

Tenacious should be our next President.
Posted via VolNation Mobile

If I had a nickel, brother.
Posted via VolNation Mobile

 

[Tenacious D]

Oh! I get it now, Tenacious "D". I always thought that the "D" stood for "defense". Now I know what kind of Tenacious "D" that you like.
Posted via VolNation Mobile

No, you don't.
Posted via VolNation Mobile

 

[IPorange]

So what if I was? Don't judge me.

Save the sermon for the pulpit, Rev. Falwell.
Posted via VolNation Mobile

So who would be your first choice to be "forced" to have gay relations with?

 

[volger]

I would roll with BillyC,. Just sayin. JMO IMO. No homo. Or am I? I feel so dirty responding to this thread. MEDIC!

 

[Tenacious D]

So who would be your first choice to be "forced" to have gay relations with?

I'm already married - so it doesn't apply.

Unless we make it retroactive! Force everyone to divorce and complete their required gay period before being allowed to remarry.....if they even wanted to at that point, anyway.

If that was the case, I'd pick RB - because, hey, go with someone who knows the lay of the land, so to speak.
Posted via VolNation Mobile

 

[VOLatile]

I'm already married - so it doesn't apply.

Unless we make it retroactive! Force everyone to divorce and complete their required gay period before being allowed to remarry.....if they even wanted to at that point, anyway.

If that was the case, I'd pick RB - because, hey, go with someone who knows the lay of the land, so to speak.
Posted via VolNation Mobile

Forcing the Christians to commit TWO SINS in one move? I'm all for it.

 

[IPorange]

I think every woman should be forced to get pregnant twice: forced to bear the child once, and get an abortion the other. That way they'll always be making a completely informed decision.

 

[Tenacious D]

I think every woman should be forced to get pregnant twice: forced to bear the child once, and get an abortion the other. That way they'll always be making a completely informed decision.

Forced pregnancy = rape.

But don't rapists have rights, too? Do gay rapists have more? They should, but do they?
Posted via VolNation Mobile

 

[Tenacious D]

Forcing the Christians to commit TWO SINS in one move? I'm all for it.

Yeah!

Nothing wrong with terrorizing some Christians! What have they ever done but preach at everyone?! Oh, and pass judgment.
Posted via VolNation Mobile

 

[IPorange]

Yeah!

Nothing wrong with terrorizing some Christians! What have they ever done but preach at everyone?! Oh, and pass judgment.
Posted via VolNation Mobile

Fair is fair. All atheists should be forced to go to every sort of church/temple/mosque/synagogue available, to make sure they know what they're doing.

 

[Weezy]

Gays are just guys who figured out how to beat the system, the one that obliges us to deal with an inferior sex in order to get our rocks off. I support this proposal in that it will surely help curve population control and hopefully put women back in their place.

 

[VOLatile]

Fair is fair. All atheists should be forced to go to every sort of church/temple/mosque/synagogue available, to make sure they know what they're doing.

I've been to three of the four mentioned, so I'd like to say I know what I'm doing. Heh. I would really like to travel to a bonafide Buddhist temple in Asia someday, though.

 

[Tenacious D]

I've been to three of the four mentioned, so I'd like to say I know what I'm doing. Heh. I would really like to travel to a bonafide Buddhist temple in Asia someday, though.

That's awesome that you did that! Its nice to see someone actually put the work in to support their beliefs.

I mean, nothing would let you really understand the true nature of the various religions than attending their places of worship.

This must be why all church-going Christians are such perfect representations of Christ, and his message.

If there was an after-life (silliness, I know) C.S. Lewis would be smiling.
Posted via VolNation Mobile

 

[Lexvol]

If I did some "experimenting" in college, could I apply for a gay waiver and maybe try polygamy instead?