Except for Kentucky, I haven't seen an SEC team that can shut down Maymon and Stokes without picking up a lot of fouls.
UT could play .750 ball the rest of the way if they can keep the opponents' 1st-team Bigs on the bench.
About UK...they only way I see them losing is if a team is red hot from threes and Davis picks up 2 fouls quickly. However, the defense is incredible. I dont care about the refs...a logical person knows Davis is one heck of a defender along with the whole team.
As for UT, i dont know. They have pretty good offense w/ stokes,maymon...however, someone needs to step up and play consistent along those two. Yemi looks alright and Hall needs some work. Defense is bad. McBee cant guard anyone. Stokes needs to work on a bit of defense. Overall, i see UT finishing decent with 1 win in the SECT. I also see them doing well in NIT. But only if someone steps up and leads this team other than Stokes.
So what you're saying is offense is our strong suit? I would have to disagree there. I agree with most of what you say though.
Defensively UT is getting better with Stokes/Maymon. If players like McBee could step up and get better defense, UT as a whole would benefit because they could stay on the floor.
Check the numbers out defense is tops in most categories in sec in sec play, we're right by you guys in most. Our offense is atrocious, that's why we win games 65-58, good d bad offense.
this would require the ball going inside ALOT and for whatever reason it doesnt. i like your idea though.
We had a couple of really good plays yesterday where the ball movement was good and crisp. Resulted in big men scoring.Very true. Knocking down the open shots off kick outs would help too.
Except for Kentucky, I haven't seen an SEC team that can shut down Maymon and Stokes without picking up a lot of fouls.
UT could play .750 ball the rest of the way if they can keep the opponents' 1st-team Bigs on the bench.