I have a feeling that was probably more of a case of Reggie Ball having a worse than average Reggie Ball kind of game.
Exactly. Same thing for the Georgia game -- Johnson had two lousy catches. But Ball barely even threw it to him -- he was too busy running around aimlessly behind the line and fumbling, I guess.
What Tidwell said... CJ just had to suit up for the games and he'd win it. They just picked up a big name and some big stats to go watch CJ win the award. Exact same thing is happening with the Heisman.
A few weeks ago I was watching the UT-Arkansas game from 1997. It was interesting to hear the announcers call Manning the "prohibitive" favorite to win the award, since there were only three weeks left in the year. They even briefly mentioned the other candidates, and Charles Woodson's name never came up. A month later Woodson was striding across the podium to accept the award.
That's when I checked out on these individual awards, because they are so ill-defined as to be worthless. Ron Dayne won it on the strength of a career award, but Charles Woodson won it based on three weeks of Sportscenter hype. Leinart won easily two years ago, but was never taken seriously as a candidate last year. Is it a one-year award? a career award? a hybrid? In the absence of an actual standard, it ends up being just a stupid ephemeral beauty contest.
The same thing is true of these other individual awards. There's no doubt in my mind that Calvin Johnson is the "best" receiver in the country, in the sense that I would take him first if I we were out on the playground choosing up teams. He'll be the first receiver taken in the draft. But there's also no doubt that Robert Meachem had a better year on the field. So in the absence of a definition for this award, I can't really get worked up about who wins it.
Having said that, Robert Meachem is certainly my FAVORITE receiver, and I would much rather him come back for his senior year than Calvin Johnson...!