Liper
Senior Member
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2005
- Messages
- 1,500
- Likes
- 2
It finally donned on me what this whole "execution" thing is about - the thing that Fulmer cites as our problem after 85% of our games. It's a way of being shocked that such ample coaching isn't getting results on the field. In other words, Fulmer and Co. are absolved from the players' responsibility to execute.
If you do a Google search or something similiar, you will have to sift through mountains of old articles where he blamed that ambiguous term known as "execution."
Folks, the reason we don't execute is that the players are not being taught; they don't understand what to do. This is particularly true of the finer points of their respective positions, those little areas that make all of the difference when compounded by 11 separate positions working together instantaneously.
The great teams - with the great coaches - execute very well. That's sort of what they are known for. We see, in fact, that good, executing teams are the ones that are well coached. Some of the names that come to mind are Neyland, Bryant, Lombardi, Spurrier, and many others. But the point is that those teams always look "well put together."
Our players are not "taking it to the field" because they don't know what to do. If they knew what to do, they would it. They are certainly capable. This concept is also why I don't really think it is the play calling so much as the execution. The difference is that Fulmer & Co. think execution is all on the players - and why they never know what is wrong because they already eliminate themselves from consideration.
Liper
If you do a Google search or something similiar, you will have to sift through mountains of old articles where he blamed that ambiguous term known as "execution."
Folks, the reason we don't execute is that the players are not being taught; they don't understand what to do. This is particularly true of the finer points of their respective positions, those little areas that make all of the difference when compounded by 11 separate positions working together instantaneously.
The great teams - with the great coaches - execute very well. That's sort of what they are known for. We see, in fact, that good, executing teams are the ones that are well coached. Some of the names that come to mind are Neyland, Bryant, Lombardi, Spurrier, and many others. But the point is that those teams always look "well put together."
Our players are not "taking it to the field" because they don't know what to do. If they knew what to do, they would it. They are certainly capable. This concept is also why I don't really think it is the play calling so much as the execution. The difference is that Fulmer & Co. think execution is all on the players - and why they never know what is wrong because they already eliminate themselves from consideration.
Liper