Gore says global warming skeptics

#1
OrangeEmpire

OrangeEmpire

The White Debonair
Joined
Nov 28, 2005
Messages
74,988
Likes
60
#1
Are this generations racists......

Sorry for no link, cant figure it out from the phone but it is from the daily caller
 
#2
#2
OrangeEmpire said:
Are this generations racists......

Sorry for no link, cant figure it out from the phone but it is from the daily caller
Click to expand...

Here you go, you evil Global Warmiing non-believing Climatist!!
BTW , what color is Global Warming so i know how to allocate my hatred better, I'm thinking about creating a hatefilled bumper sticker or tyedye shirt perhaps with denial slogans & such to show my prejudice.

Fighting for Mother Earth’s Civil Rights: Al Gore Says Debating With Him on Climate Science Is the Moral Equivalent of Being a Bull Connor Racist | Video | TheBlaze.com
 
#5
#5
VOLatile said:
This. And I'm a liberal who accepts global climate change. Al Gore should not be the spokesman.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Click to expand...

I agree with you on Al Gore. That being said, I am certain more conservatives would believe in the real phenomena if it had been brought to the forefront by a conservative rather than a liberal.

It shouldn't surprise any reasonably intelligent person that most of the scientists that scoff at global warming are also proponents of intelligent design rather than espousing the theory of evolution.
 
#6
#6
BelAirVol said:
I agree with you on Al Gore. That being said, I am certain more conservatives would believe in the real phenomena if it had been brought to the forefront by a conservative rather than a liberal.

It shouldn't surprise any reasonably intelligent person that most of the scientists that scoff at global warming are also proponents of intelligent design rather than espousing the theory of evolution.
Click to expand...

Let's not start a ToE debate. But you're right, not surprising at all.
 
#7
#7
That should be "Belairheadvol." :loco:

Ronald Reagan said words to the effect; "It's not that liberals don't know anything, it's that most of what they know isn't true."

His words are even more true today than when he uttered them.

ge-eco-imagination.jpg


obama57u.jpg


mallardfillmore20110825.gif


35lzvoj.jpg
 
#8
#8
BelAirVol said:
I agree with you on Al Gore. That being said, I am certain more conservatives would believe in the real phenomena if it had been proven by more than a .7 degree increase over 100 years that was not very much within the range of normal climate cycles as PROVEN by direct evidence and written history.
Click to expand...

It shouldn't surprise any reasonably intelligent person that most of the scientists that scoff at global warming are also proponents of intelligent design rather than espousing the theory of evolution.
Click to expand...

Nothing here but a prejudicial red herring. Facts are facts. Temperatures are cycling consistent with the natural cycles seen in ice cores as well as historical records.

Sun activity is FAR and away more significant to any recent warming/cooling than anything being done by man.
 
#9
#9
BelAirVol said:
I agree with you on Al Gore. That being said, I am certain more conservatives would believe in the real phenomena if it had been brought to the forefront by a conservative rather than a liberal.

It shouldn't surprise any reasonably intelligent person that most of the scientists that scoff at global warming are also proponents of intelligent design rather than espousing the theory of evolution.
Click to expand...

This. We knew about the effects of global warming and greenhouse gases before Gore's movie. Now half the country thinks they are climatologists because they heard their favorite politician comment about it on MSNBC/FOX. Sad state of affairs when people confuse science with politics.
 
#10
#10
sjt18 said:
Nothing here but a prejudicial red herring. Facts are facts. Temperatures are cycling consistent with the natural cycles seen in ice cores as well as historical records.

Sun activity is FAR and away more significant to any recent warming/cooling than anything being done by man.
Click to expand...

This a billion times.

Do everything Al Gore tells us to will change jack squat when it comes to the climate. Not that Gore himself even does what he says we should.
 
#11
#11
you'll be sorry when NY freezes over. You best hope you're in the same vicinity as Gyllenhaal, so Quaid can save you.
 
#12
#12
wilrob75 said:
This. We knew about the effects of global warming and greenhouse gases before Gore's movie. Now half the country thinks they are climatologists because they heard their favorite politician comment about it on MSNBC/FOX. Sad state of affairs when people confuse science with politics.
Click to expand...
Did you really respond with this to a guy lumping two sets of completely disparate scientists together, as if the one group knows shat from shinola about the other?
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#13
#13
shoutracism.jpg


Science wins over
quackery/theory/hoax
again, another nail in
the coffin.

Alarmists Got it Wrong, Humans Not Responsible for Climate Change: CERN - International Business Times


Research findings published by none less than CERN,
the European Organization for Nuclear Research, in
the journal Nature which holds cosmic rays and sun,
and not human activities, responsible for global
warming, isn't exactly what Al Gore would welcome
right now.

CERN, which created and operates the Large Hadron
Collider, has now built a stainless steel chamber that
precisely recreates the Earth's atmosphere.

In this chamber, 63 CERN scientists from 17 European
and American institutes demonstrated that cosmic
rays promote the formation of molecules which
grow in Earth's atmosphere and seed clouds, making
it cloudier and cooler.
Click to expand...

Someone notify Al, the Earth is not flat, the Earth
rotates around the sun and AGW is more laughable
now that ever!!

Oh Wait, Al is renewing his propaganda campaign
with new vigor.

The Al Gore Show: 24 Hours of Denying Reality Roy Spencer, Ph. D.

There have been no weather events observed to date
– including Hurricane Irene — which can be reasonably
claimed to be outside the realm of natural climate
variability.

Now, you can believe – as Al Gore claims – that the
present warm period we are experiencing has caused
more hurricanes, more tornadoes, too much rain, too
little rain, too much snow, too little snow, etc., but
those are matters of faith, not of observable
scientific reality.

Until a month or so ago, we were near record lows in
global tropical cyclone activity, after a precipitous 6-
year drop following the most recent 2005 peak in
activity (click for full size version):
----------------------------

Also, we have not had a Cat 3 or stronger hurricane
make landfall in the U.S. in almost 6 years now, which
is the longest ‘drought’ for U.S. landfalling major
hurricanes on record.

There is even published evidence that the 1970s and
1980s might have experienced the lowest levels of
hurricane activity in 270 years (Nyberg et al. 2007
Nature 447: 698-702), and that the 20th Century (a
period of warming) experienced less hurricane activity
than in previous centuries (Chenoweth and Divine 2008
Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems).

Claims that warming “should” or “will” cause more
hurricanes are based upon theory, that’s all. What I
have listed are based upon historical events, which
suggest (if anything) periods of warmth might also be
periods of fewer hurricanes, not more.
-----------------------------------


I especially dislike Gore’s and others’ use of the
pejorative “denier”. Even some climate scientists
who should know better have started using the
term.

What exactly does Mr. Gore think we “deny”?

Do we deny climate? No, we were studying climate
since before he could spell the word. (I would
question whether Al can spell it yet, given his
academic rechord and the fact that he looks
buzzed out of his mind on coke all the time.)gs

Do we deny global warming? No, we believe it has
indeed warmed in the last few hundred years, just
like it did before the Medieval Warm Period around
1000 AD:
-------------------------

So what do we deny, if anything? Well, what *I*
deny is that we can say with any level of certainty
how much of our recent warmth is due to humanity’s
greenhouse gas emissions versus natural climate
variability.

No one pays me to say this. It’s the most obvious
scientific conclusion based upon the evidence. When
the IPCC talks about the high “probability” that warming
in the last 50 years is mostly manmade, they are talking
about their level of faith. Statistical probabilities do not
apply to one-of-a-kind, theoretically-expected events.

I could have done better in my career if I played along
with the IPCC global warming talking points, which would
have led to more funded contracts and more
publications.

It is much easier to get published if you include phrases
like, “…this suggests anthropogenic global warming could
be worse than previously thought” in your study.

In contrast, Mr. Gore has made hundreds of millions of
dollars by preaching his message of a “climate crisis”.

I would say that it is Mr. Gore who is the “climate
denier”, since he denies the role of nature in climate
variability. He instead chooses to use theory as
his “reality”.
Click to expand...

Oh well, he is just a point man for Barry these days
and the height of his accomplishments was being Slick
Willy's yes man, what can you expect?

polar%252520bear%252520crap%25255B3%25255D.jpg


Weekend Libertarian: Climate Alarmist Ove Hoegh-Guldberg Advocates Groupthink

I’m not sure what “global change” means, to be frank,
or what an “active research scientist” is. I do know
what an activist research scientist looks like, however.
His name is Ove Hoegh-Guldberg.
Click to expand...

Plus, beware of hypenated names.

prof-ove-hoegh-guldberg.jpg


I'm thinking Ove Hoegh-Ghoudburg has been snorting
more than sea water, (as I suspect Al has been doing
also), and he, like Al is a bit off his rocker.

shout_racist.jpg
 
#18
#18
So most people believe that global warming exists, but it's just the earths natural cycle and we don't play much of an impact?
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#21
#21
Vols520 said:
So most people believe that global warming exists, but it's just the earths natural cycle and we don't play much of an impact?
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Click to expand...

I can live with this........dont buy into the day after tomorrow crowd
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#25
#25
OrangeEmpire said:
I can live with this........dont buy into the day after tomorrow crowd
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Click to expand...

Gemeinnutzgeht vor Eigennutz. (The common good
supersedes the private good.) ~ Nazi slogan Prologue
Fanatical environmentalism, vegetarianism, animal rights
and public health are four progressive policy initiatives
that most people would not readily associate with Hitler
and the Nazis. "Unlike Marxism, which declared much of
culture and humanity irrelevant to the revolution,
National Socialism was holistic," wrote Jonah Goldberg.
Indeed, "organic" and "holistic" were the Nazi terms of
art for totalitarianism.






TennTradition said:
In this thread.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Click to expand...

facepalm.jpg


In this time!

Did you read the CERN study?

No evidence, (even though there have been repeated
wild claims and dumb in, dumb out computer projections,)
has yet been produced that human activity has more
than a very minimal effect on global temperatures which will ultimately be overruled by natural forces but still our
government is in the process of wrecking the most
prosperous economy in world history and enslaving our grandchildren in debt to very wealthy international
financiers that intend to control our fortunes in a
feudalistic manner, all based on baseless propaganda
and wild eyed conjecture.

Former Nazi Bank To Rule The Global Economy Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind!

B.I.S. - ex-Nazi bank now the world central bank - The Bank for International Settlements, Basel, Switzerland
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top