gsvol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2008
- Messages
- 14,179
- Likes
- 10
CO2 is good for the planet.
No need for the irrational fear induced fascistic legislation proposed by Obama, demonrats and their association of rinos.
So too says Freeman Dyson, physicist at the Institute for Advanced Studies in Princeton, NJ (think Albert Einstein's old home)...Dyson says the computer models that have been promising global warming do a terrible job of predicting, and that the CO2 which is supposed to be so bad for us actually is quite beneficial to the planet, among other things encouraging vigorous plant growth - poor Charlie Rose who was nterviewing him at the time almost fell off of his chair when he heard these heresies......
Thank goodness that our energy bills won't have to double to appease the chicken littles in our midst!!!
No need for the irrational fear induced fascistic legislation proposed by Obama, demonrats and their association of rinos.
More CO2 means better crops and forests, Steward says, but not necessarily a warmer planet since other factors play a bigger role in heating the planet.
This relates directly to the food supply, he said. Green is good, and CO2 is very green.
CO2 boosts plant growth, making them larger, faster-growing and more drought tolerant with better roots. Steward calls that good news in a world with a growing population.
When youre deciding what ought to be done, think about what this could do for mankind, he said.
Taking CO2 back to pre-industrial levels would degrade habitats and push people into starvation, Steward said.
CO2 is not a pollutant. Its the stuff of life. I cant find anything thats not beneficial, he said. This comes from thousands of studies mainly from the agricultural community, and these are not casual observers.
Spending billions and enacting draconian restrictions to fight a pollutant thats not a pollutant isnt helping anyone, he said.
If we let our factories continue to manufacture, thats not necessarily bad and might be good, he said. We (pro-CO2 groups) are greener than all the green organizations lobbying to reduce CO2.
Its a message scientists across the world are trying to promote, and Steward cited numerous studies.
When he started researching climate change four years ago, Steward found there are 18 drivers of climate change, including things like variation in the shape of the earths orbit, sunspots and the magnetic effect of the sun.
CO2s ability to trap heat declines logarithmically, so a great deal of the gas makes a big difference, but as the level dips the difference it makes drops exponentially.
That means doubling the current concentration of CO2 would only make a .2 degree difference, he said.
If CO2 was a significant factor in global warming, temperatures would have risen as modeling predicted instead of declining since 2001.
Its hard to argue with that, he said. They did not predict in any of their models that it would be cooling.
Since the Industrial Revolution, people have pumped CO2 into the atmosphere and temperature has generally risen, though not always.
These are natural trends, he said. Look at the magnitude of climate variation. Huge swings of 10, 15, 20 degrees.
Former vice president Al Gore got facts wrong in his documentary, An Inconvenient Truth, Steward said.
Clearly things were absolutely false in some cases and misleading in other cases, he said.
For example, Gore said the earth was warming at an unprecedented rate. However, in the 1920s and 30s, the temperature increase was more dramatic, Steward said.
Contrary to Gores findings, cyclone and tornado strength is actually down now, says Steward, a geologist and retired energy industry executive. He is a trustee at the Buffalo Bill Historical Center and lives on the North Fork and in Texas.
Steward, the author of the best-seller Sugar Busters, recently published Fire, Ice and Paradise on climate change.
This summer, he organized a non-profit organization, Plants Need CO2, with the mission, To educate the public on the positive effects of additional atmospheric CO2 and help prevent the inadvertent negative impact to human, plant and animal life if we reduce CO2.
Im not getting a penny for doing this, he added. Its just something people of the earth ought to know.
So too says Freeman Dyson, physicist at the Institute for Advanced Studies in Princeton, NJ (think Albert Einstein's old home)...Dyson says the computer models that have been promising global warming do a terrible job of predicting, and that the CO2 which is supposed to be so bad for us actually is quite beneficial to the planet, among other things encouraging vigorous plant growth - poor Charlie Rose who was nterviewing him at the time almost fell off of his chair when he heard these heresies......
Thank goodness that our energy bills won't have to double to appease the chicken littles in our midst!!!