gsvol compendium thread

#2
#2
Over 50 National Leaders and Organizations will attend.

Conference Convener Attorney Malik Zulu Shabazz anf (sp) Former Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney will deliver the Convention Keynote Speeches on Saturday Night May 29th

On Monday May 31st A Major Youth Power Rally will take place with popular artists Erykah Badu, Andre 3000 and other Major National Entertainers.

Andre and Erykah still together? :blink:
 
#3
#3
After what I've heard some of the say, the TPer's look like kittens compared to them.

But no....let's keep focusing on how dangerous the TPer's are.
 
#5
#5
good luck getting the senate to ratify it, where I believe treaties of this nature require 66 votes. Obama can support it all he wants, but if the Senate doesn't, or can't, ratify it, it'll never make it to his desk.

also, I think it's unconstitutional to sign a treaty of this nature.
 
#6
#6
Andre and Erykah still together? :blink:

Are they an item, to be honest I never heard of them.




After what I've heard some of the say, the TPer's look like kittens compared to them.

But no....let's keep focusing on how dangerous the TPer's are.

Yep, those dirty rotten tea baggers are a bunch of racists you know.

This Just In: Gadsden Flag Now Officially "Offensive" In America

Gadsden-flag.jpg



Why would anyone be offended by the Gadsden flag?

Why shouldn't we just ignore such idiotic complaints??
 
#7
#7
good luck getting the senate to ratify it, where I believe treaties of this nature require 66 votes. Obama can support it all he wants, but if the Senate doesn't, or can't, ratify it, it'll never make it to his desk.

also, I think it's unconstitutional to sign a treaty of this nature.

2/3 majority would be 67 I think?

No way he will get it ratified but I believe Clinton signed the Kyoto Protocols although I don't think he ever presented it to Congress.

No doubt some other countries may have thought that reason to sign themselves, not knowing the president's signature is meaningless without senate ratification.
 
#12
#12
Looks like some of those people don't know that more than 80% of Mexicans have at least some European blood.

Unless they're all actually indigenous.
 
Last edited:
#13
#13
Looks like a good place to start the round up.

What other countries in the world would NOT do just that???

From four years ago.


3.jpg


larazchicago.jpg


And the fantasy legend of Che Guevara is every bit the fairy tail as that of the marxist inspired Aztlan et al.

Never ever underestimate the power of socialist propaganda, look how many young people on this board would attempt to stamp 'racist' on any citizen who wants secure borders and an orderly immigration law enforced.

And for those young indoctrinated morons, I would bet money I personally know more hispanics and/or latinos than all of them put together.





Looks like some of those people don't know that more than 80% of Mexicans have at least some European blood.

Unless they're all actually indigenous.


“The True History of the Southwest,”
by Matthew Bracken (actually I believe Travis McGee first wrote this and called it history of the southwest 101.)gs

The fallacies surrounding the history of the Southwest are staggering, chief among them the “Aztlan” fairy tales. What is the truth? How did the Spanish Europeans conquer the Southwest? The “conquistadores” (that means “conquerors”) did it with the lance, and the lash.

For example, in 1541 Coronado entered present-day New Mexico (which included present-day Arizona during the Spanish era) searching for the “lost cities of gold.” One of his first actions upon meeting the natives was to burn hundreds of them alive in their dwellings, for not handing over suspected horse thieves. That is how Spain conquered the natives of the present US Southwest—not with hugs and kisses. It was certainly no love-fest between long-lost brown-skinned soul-mates, as it is often portrayed today by the delusional Aztlaners, who spin the “new bronze race of Mestizos” toro-mierda fable.

By 1821, Mexico City was strong enough to overthrow the even more decrepit and ineffectual Spanish colonial rule. However, the distant provinces of the current U.S. Southwest were far beyond the reach of the authority of the independent but strife-torn new government in Mexico City. These distant northern provinces received neither military protection nor needed levels of trade from the south. Under Spanish colonial rule, trade with the USA was forbidden, but at least Spain provided trade and Army protection from hostile Indians. Under Mexican abandonment and neglect, the Southwest received neither trade nor protection from Mexico City.

For example, Comanches and Apaches ran rampant in the 1830s in the power vacuum created by Mexican neglect, burning scores of major ranches that had been active for hundreds of years and massacring their inhabitants. Mexico City could neither defend nor keep the allegiance of its nominal subjects in these regions. Nor did it provide needed levels of trade to sustain the prior Spanish colonial era standard of living. Mexican governmental influence atrophied, withered and died at the same time that American pathfinders were opening up new routes into the region.

Increasingly, a growing United States of America was making inroads into the Southwest, via ships into California, and via wagon trains of trade goods over the Santa Fe Trail from St. Louis. The standard of living of the Spanish inhabitants of California, Arizona, New Mexico and Texas subsequently increased enormously, which is why they did not support Mexico City in the 1846-48 war. In fact, the Spanish-speaking inhabitants of the Southwest never considered themselves “Mexicans” at all, ever. They went, in their own eyes, from Spanish directly to American. To this very day, if you want a punch in the nose, just call an Hispanic native of New Mexico a “Mexican.”

So how long did Mexico City have even nominal jurisdiction (in their eyes) over the American Southwest? For only 25 years, during which they had no effective control, and the area slipped backwards by every measure until the arrival of the Americans. The Spanish inhabitants of the Southwest never transferred their loyalty to Mexico City, because all they received from the chaotic Mexican government was misrule, neglect, and unchecked Indian raids.

Since then, how long has the area been under firm American control? For 150 continuous years, during which time the former Spanish inhabitants of the region, now American citizens, have prospered beyond the wildest dreams of the Mexicans still stuck in Mexico. To compare the infrastructure, roads, schools, hospitals etc. of the two regions is to understand the truth. The Mexican government has been mired in endemic graft, corruption, nepotism and chaos from the very start until today. The ordinary Mexican peons have been trampled and abused, while only the super-rich elites have thrived. This is why millions of Mexicans want to escape from Mexico today, to enjoy the benefits of living in America that they can never hope to obtain in Mexico.

And because today Mexico is a corrupt third-world pest-hole (despite having more millionaires and billionaires than Great Britain), we are supposed to let any number of Mexicans from Chiapas, Michoacan or Yucatan march into the American Southwest, and make some “historical claim” of a right to live there?

From where does this absurd idea spring?

At what point in history did Indians and Mestizos from Zacatecas or Durango stake a claim on the American Southwest? Neither they nor their ancestors ever lived for one single day in the American Southwest. The Spanish living in the Southwest in 1846 stayed there, and became Americans by the treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo. There were no Spanish inhabitants of the Southwest who were marched to the border and driven into Mexico. It didn’t happen. The Spanish in the Southwest welcomed American citizenship, which brought stability, protection from Indian raids, and a vast increase in their standard of living with the increase in trade with America.

In summary, no current inhabitants of Mexico have a claim on even one single inch of the American Southwest. Not one single citizen of Mexico is sneaking into the United States to reclaim property their ancestors were deprived of. Not one. They are criminal invaders and colonizers, pure and simple.

It’s time Americans learned the true history, as a counter to the currently prevalent "Aztlan" fairy tales put out by "La Raza" (The Race), "MEChA" (the Student Movement for Aztlan) and other radical anti-American groups.

------------------------------------





"The way to make money is to buy when blood is running in the streets."
John D. Rockefeller
 
#16
#16
Experts seek to clarify their views on drilling moratorium | NOLA.com

The National Academy of Engineering provided seven reviewers for Salazar's safety report, and the academy's Ken Arnold, an oil and gas industry consultant, wrote a scathing cover letter Tuesday that concludes: "The Secretary should be free to recommend whatever he thinks is correct, but he should not be free to use our names to justify his political decisions."
 
#17
#17
Didn't this WH house say decisions would be driven by science and scientific evidence?
 
#19
#19
One would just about have to be semi-comatose not to notice the many nonsequiturs in Obambis' rhetoric.
 
#20
#20
A sheriff in an Arizona county has said with certainty that Mexican drug cartels control parts of his state and is begging the Obama administration for a massive deployment of National Guard troops to the Arizona-Mexico border.

Drug violence spills into Pinal County - KGUN 9 On Your Side, Tucson News, Weather & Sports

This isn't even a border county in Arizona.

Don't know if it a joke or not but some say they have put up highway signes signs that say 'beware, drug corridor.'

Victims of Illegal Aliens Memorial, Memorial, illegal alien, victim, murdered, killed, David March, Daniel Golden, Ruben Morfin, Scott Gardner, Kris Eggle, Marc Atkinson, OJJPAC, ohio jobs and justice, Steve Salvi, Salvi, ojjpac.org, shaw, killed by
 
#21
#21
A sheriff in an Arizona county has said with certainty that Mexican drug cartels control parts of his state and is begging the Obama administration for a massive deployment of National Guard troops to the Arizona-Mexico border.

Drug violence spills into Pinal County - KGUN 9 On Your Side, Tucson News, Weather & Sports

This isn't even a border county in Arizona.

Don't know if it a joke or not but some say they have put up highway signes signs that say 'beware, drug corridor.'

Victims of Illegal Aliens Memorial, Memorial, illegal alien, victim, murdered, killed, David March, Daniel Golden, Ruben Morfin, Scott Gardner, Kris Eggle, Marc Atkinson, OJJPAC, ohio jobs and justice, Steve Salvi, Salvi, ojjpac.org, shaw, killed by

While this area is not literally on the border, it is the county that you have to cross through to get from Tucson to Phoenix.
 
#25
#25
Can't he deploy his own NG troops????
Posted via VolNation Mobile

The sheriff has absolutely no authority over the National Guard.

If he had enough armed volunteers he could deputize them and have a small army of untrained (and probably unpaid) militia men.

Governors lost most authority over National Guard forces in 2007.

Governors lose in power struggle over National Guard

Over objections from all 50 governors, Congress in October tweaked the 200-year-old Insurrection Act to empower the hand of the president in future stateside emergencies.
-------------------------------------

A bipartisan majority of both chambers of Congress adopted the change as part of the 439-page, $538 billion 2007 Defense Authorization Bill signed into law last October.
--------------------------------

Under the U.S. Constitution, each state's National Guard unit is controlled by the governor in time of peace but can be called up for federal duty by the president. The National Guard employs 444,000 part-time soldiers between its two branches: the Army and Air National Guards.

The Posse Comitatus Act of 1878 forbids U.S. troops from being deployed on American soil for law enforcement. The one exception is provided by the Insurrection Act of 1807, which lets the president use the military only for the purpose of putting down rebellions or enforcing constitutional rights if state authorities fail to do so. Under that law, the president can declare an insurrection and call in the armed forces.

The act has been invoked only a handful of times in the past 50 years, including in 1957 to desegregate schools and in 1992 during riots in south central Los Angeles after the acquittal of police accused of beating Rodney King.

Congress changed the Insurrection Act to list "natural disaster, epidemic, or other serious public health emergency, terrorist attack or incident" as conditions under which the president can deploy U.S. armed forces and federalize state Guard troops if he determines that "authorities of the state or possession are incapable of maintaining public order."

IMO the federal government has been trying to get around or negate Posse Comitatus Act since it was first enacted.

During the Katrina incident there was so much leftist propaganda out there it was unbelieveable, when Bush first mentioned the act as his reason for not immediately calling in the Gurard to NO, on some leftist site I happened to be reading and one asked what is Posse Comitatus and was informed it was a racist right wing group.

The truth is out there all right but so is a lot of left wing urban myth masquerading as the truth.

That sorry excuse we currently refer to as our president has more than ample cause and authority to deploy NG forces along the US/Mexico border.

The 1,200 he has alread called is just window dressing and a joke, they are mostly administrative and not even assigned to the border crossing areas, and if they were actually deployed on the border, 1,200 would be about one soldier for every two miles of border.
 

VN Store



Back
Top