Billy Costigan
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2010
- Messages
- 4,555
- Likes
- 8
Before it became compulsory thanks to the Red Scare in the 50s, lots of pre-WW2 Presidents didn't fit squarely into the definition of Christian.
All the below weren't regular Church-going Christians:
James Madison
James Monroe
Martin Van Buren
William Henry Harrison
John Tyler
Zachary Taylor
Andrew Johnson
Ulysses S. Grant
Rutherford B. Hayes
Chester Arthur
Before it became compulsory thanks to the Red Scare in the 50s, lots of pre-WW2 Presidents didn't fit squarely into the definition of Christian.
All the below weren't regular Church-going Christians:
James Madison
James Monroe
Martin Van Buren
William Henry Harrison
John Tyler
Zachary Taylor
Andrew Johnson
Ulysses S. Grant
Rutherford B. Hayes
Chester Arthur
How relevant is the Red Scare when all the presidents listed above served in the 19th Century?
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Red Scare - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Those guys were pre-WW2, before religion was a major determining factor in elections. The Red Scare brought religion to the forefront by labeling Communists as atheists and the like.
And what about the presidents from the first half of the 20th Century?
Posted via VolNation Mobile
You say FDR was war mongering, but do you think he should have handled things differently?
I think he should have been less devious in the manner in which he sustained the British war effort and prepared the US for war. I also do not think that he should have declared war on German ships in September of 1941 and should not have demanded, in October 1941, that Japan give up their Manchurian territory which they had taken in 1932.
I think he knew that the US populace and Congress would not vote for an expeditionary war unless the US was attacked; I think he did everything in his power to provoke an attack.
Note: I am not in any way saying that FDR conspired with the Japanese or with anyone in the attack on Pearl; I am saying that FDR was intent on poking both tigers until they struck so that the US would give up its "isolationism".
I think he should have been less devious in the manner in which he sustained the British war effort and prepared the US for war. I also do not think that he should have declared war on German ships in September of 1941 and should not have demanded, in October 1941, that Japan give up their Manchurian territory which they had taken in 1932.
I think he knew that the US populace and Congress would not vote for an expeditionary war unless the US was attacked; I think he did everything in his power to provoke an attack.
Note: I am not in any way saying that FDR conspired with the Japanese or with anyone in the attack on Pearl; I am saying that FDR was intent on poking both tigers until they struck so that the US would give up its "isolationism".