House GOP Plans Death Panel for Elmo

#1

bam15

Burning time on this site
Joined
Nov 17, 2007
Messages
8,344
Likes
3
#1
House Republicans called for cuts in hundreds of programs across the face of government Friday night in a $61 billion savings package toughened at the last minute at the demand of tea party-backed conservatives.

From education to job training, the environment and nutrition, few domestic programs were left untouched - and some were eliminated - in the measure, which is expected to reach the floor for a vote next week.

Among the programs targeted for elimination are Americorps and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting.

In contrast, spending on defense and veterans' programs were protected.

It blocks the spending of about $2 billion in unused economic stimulus money and seeks to prevent the Internal Revenue Service from enforcing the new health care law. The measure also cuts financing directly from the office of the president.

Some of the largest cuts would be borne by WIC, which provides nutritional support for women and infants, cut by $747 million, and training and employment grants to the states, ticketed for a $1.4 billion reduction.

In addition, Republicans proposed a 43 percent cut in border security fencing and a 53 percent reduction in an account used to fund cleanup of the Great Lakes.

It prohibits the Nuclear Regulatory Commission from terminating plans for a nuclear waste site at Yucca Mountain in Nevada - a direct challenge to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev.

Reid dissented quickly, issuing a statement that said, "Any attempt to restart the Yucca Mountain project will not happen on my watch as Senate majority leader."

The Environmental Protection Agency would be banned from regulating greenhouse gases, linked to global warming, from fixed sources such as factories. The District of Columbia could not use federal funds to run a needle-exchange program for drug users.

House GOP Budget Cut Plan Targets Americorps, Corporation For Public Broadcasting For Elimination
Liberals Mobilize to Save PBS, NPR Funding - Washington Whispers (usnews.com)Committee on Appropriations

Liberal groups, pubic radio, and TV stations and fans of Big Bird and All Things Considered are girding for a huge fight with House Republicans over a GOP plan to cut $100 billion in spending including zeroing out $430 million for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting.

"They probably think that no one will notice these cuts in the midst of so many others. But the millions of listeners and viewers who rely on public broadcasting for Sesame Street, All Things Considered, and independent journalism will notice," said MoveOn.org in an urgent E-mail just sent out. "We need to tell Republicans that cutting off funding was unacceptable last time they were in charge, and it's unacceptable now," said MoveOn.

ncnvco.jpg


The saddest part of all is the phony Hal Rogers, who happens to be the "King of Pork."

Chairman Hal Rogers gave the following statement on the introduction of the CR:

“This year, our nation is spending 1.5 trillion dollars more than we have, running our debt to $14 trillion. The taxpayers have told us loud and clear that this is simply unacceptable, and have demanded that we get our nation’s fiscal house in order.
 
#3
#3
at least they're making proposals and the left can no longer claim that they haven't provided any specifics.

Elmo should die, or put into a triple-threat cage match against Grouch and Grover.
 
#4
#4
PBS is the only informative channel anymore where kids and adults can both learn anything. NPR only relies on 10% of it's budget coming from the government so I'm not really worried about them. However, I love Carl Sagan's Cosmos.
 
#5
#5
I agree that the education programming of PBS has been excellent, but perhaps PBS should stick to non-partisan, non-political programming. Discovery Channel and it's network siblings provide excellent educational programming as well.

NPR should be allowed to stand on it's own. If you take a look at the salaries paid some some of it's biggest names, it certainly resembles a private company.

Had NPR not fired Juan Williams in the way that it did, this probably wouldn't have been an issue addressed this early.
 
#6
#6
I agree that the education programming of PBS has been excellent, but perhaps PBS should stick to non-partisan, non-political programming. Discovery Channel and it's network siblings provide excellent educational programming as well.

NPR should be allowed to stand on it's own. If you take a look at the salaries paid some some of it's biggest names, it certainly resembles a private company.

Had NPR not fired Juan Williams in the way that it did, this probably wouldn't have been an issue addressed this early.

Discovery Channel and the History Channel have sorta went away from educational programming. They are two of my favorite channels, but they have changed over the years for tv ratings.
 
#9
#9
Not even educational in the least.

FFS, History Channel now has a show featuring Larry the Cable Guy! Worthless.

Problem is they are looking for viewers. What may not seem ultra educational makes for more viewers. If it didn't you wouldn't see such shows.
 
#11
#11
PBS is the only informative channel anymore where kids and adults can both learn anything. NPR only relies on 10% of it's budget coming from the government so I'm not really worried about them. However, I love Carl Sagan's Cosmos.

Sesame street does not need public funding. Go to any toy store anywhere and something about sesame street is being pushed by FP. They are making enough money that they don't need ours.
 
#13
#13
I notice that anytime the GOP proposes spending cuts or even a reduction in the rate of growth, it is always viewed by the left as harming "the children". Why is this? Why resort to illogical, emotional arguments that often have little basis in reality? The title of this thread is a perfect example. So what if the CPB loses public funding? Does anybody in their right mind really think that Sesame Street is going off the air?
 
#14
#14
I'm not worried about Sesame Street. More worried about the niche programming that I and many others love like Cosmos and NOVA that most likely wouldn't be picked up by any other stations because they don't command the viewership.

Besides, PBS and NPR aren't going anywhere. The GOP is just positioning so the news reporters will lay off them a little bit. Empty threats.
 
#15
#15
I'm not worried about Sesame Street. More worried about the niche programming that I and many others love like Cosmos and NOVA that most likely wouldn't be picked up by any other stations because they don't command the viewership.

Besides, PBS and NPR aren't going anywhere. The GOP is just positioning so the news reporters will lay off them a little bit. Empty threats.

Not my problem. Not anyones problem. Show wants to stay on find advertisers like everyone else. If you can't then goodbye. There's a thing called the library. It's full of all kinds of niches.
 
#16
#16
I agree that the education programming of PBS has been excellent, but perhaps PBS should stick to non-partisan, non-political programming. Discovery Channel and it's network siblings provide excellent educational programming as well.

NPR should be allowed to stand on it's own. If you take a look at the salaries paid some some of it's biggest names, it certainly resembles a private company.

Had NPR not fired Juan Williams in the way that it did, this probably wouldn't have been an issue addressed this early.

Animal porn, alien abductions, and WWII recaps?

PBS is light-years ahead, as is other non-marketing funded outlets like the BBC.
 
#17
#17
Of course, these "cuts" are completely unserious. If you aren't going to touch the defense and prison industries, you simply aren't in the least bit a serious budget hawk. You are simply playing politics, and playing it badly.

This is again why it is not serious:

GOP Cuts Budget with an Axe Instead of a Scalpel

The most recent study I could find that tried to do that was published by the Tax Foundation in 2007. It found that in 2004, a typical middle class family in the middle income quintile received $16,781 in benefits from the federal government.

Hello, VolNation!
 
#18
#18
Discovery Channel and the History Channel have sorta went away from educational programming. They are two of my favorite channels, but they have changed over the years for tv ratings.

I remember TLC being The Learning Channel.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#19
#19
I'm not worried about Sesame Street. More worried about the niche programming that I and many others love like Cosmos and NOVA that most likely wouldn't be picked up by any other stations because they don't command the viewership.

Besides, PBS and NPR aren't going anywhere. The GOP is just positioning so the news reporters will lay off them a little bit. Empty threats.

Then feel free to donate to pbs to keep those shows. Just because you like something the rest of us should pay for it?
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#20
#20
Then feel free to donate to pbs to keep those shows. Just because you like something the rest of us should pay for it?
Posted via VolNation Mobile

This mentality that "x" is good and I like it so it should receive government funding is irrelevant.

If we are going to apply this standard then we will never cut anything.
 
#21
#21
I remember TLC being The Learning Channel.
Posted via VolNation Mobile

It still is if your a woman. It use to be the best out of the three. I loved it when they had "Junk yard Wars". I also loved when history channel had "Tales of the Gun". It was a great show.
 

VN Store



Back
Top