How can there be misinformation....

#1

Oldvol75

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 9, 2008
Messages
3,990
Likes
1,130
#1
about health care if Obama has no plan? This entire White House is nothing but misinformation.
 
#2
#2
He now says health care is "a core ethical and moral obligation."

So did he get a raise? I did not think his pay grade covered such issues.
 
#3
#3
He now says health care is "a core ethical and moral obligation."

So did he get a raise? I did not think his pay grade covered such issues.

He's just passing on Rev Wright's truth.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#4
#4
You...You...You...."False Witness!"

I just love the way he morphs into a southern Baptist preacher when he is speaking to a religious group, yet, he and the family run off to Camp David every weekend insted of joining a DC congregation.
 
Last edited:
#5
#5
Makes you wonder where all those groups that scream "Seperation of Church and State" are when he gets in "his" pulpit..... oh wait he is the chosen one!
 
#6
#6
interesting how liberals will invoke God and religion as a means to deflect criticism away from their big spending social welfare programs but they become decidedly agnostic/atheist when the subject is abortion or gay marriage.
 
#7
#7
interesting how liberals will invoke God and religion as a means to deflect criticism away from their big spending social welfare programs but they become decidedly agnostic/atheist when the subject is abortion or gay marriage.

It's interesting how consveratives do the same thing the other way around.
 
#10
#10
Me?

I was just countering one blank statement with another.

the Clinton defense. Everybody else has done it, so why can't I?

there are many examples of democrats "clinging to religion" when it suits their goals. Teleprompter Jesus' invoking the "bearing false witness" line of BS is one of the more egregious examples. What he's saying, basically, is that criticism of his healthcare reform is a sin.
 
#11
#11
It's interesting how consveratives do the same thing the other way around.

I assume that you mean where the early church combined all their income. Well if you simply look at it for what it says, they divided their belonging among the church folks that where there. The bible does tell us to take care of the poor. That would be the church, not the government. As a pastor of a church, we do this all the time. We have people that come to our doors and need help, we give them what we can. We have a food bank at church to take care of staples. We pay power bills, buy gas, both for homes and cars. We distribute clothes for those that need it. We provide shelter if needed. So I guess you can say that we truly do "combine our incomes" as the early church did. The difference is that we do not send them to the government, we do it ourselves!
 
#12
#12
the Clinton defense. Everybody else has done it, so why can't I?

there are many examples of democrats "clinging to religion" when it suits their goals. Teleprompter Jesus' invoking the "bearing false witness" line of BS is one of the more egregious examples. What he's saying, basically, is that criticism of his healthcare reform is a sin.

And the religious right doesn't do this with the pro-life or abstinence movement while still advocating capital punishment or abolishment of social programs to help those in need?

The difference here is one side thinks it isn't the governments responsibility to take care of people or spend on social welfare, while the other doesn't think it is the governments responsibility to tell people how to behave in the bedroom or what to do with their bodies.

This works both ways.
 
#13
#13
I'm not a member of the religious right, and I do see the contradictions in some of their policies.

but do you not recognize Obama's brazen hypocrisy when he appeals to religious leaders to support his socialized medicine policies?

and you're right, I don't think it's the federal governments job to take care of people and provide social safety nets. That's the role of the states, as provided by the 10th Amendment.
 
#14
#14
I'm not a member of the religious right, and I do see the contradictions in some of their policies.

but do you not recognize Obama's brazen hypocrisy when he appeals to religious leaders to support his socialized medicine policies?

and you're right, I don't think it's the federal governments job to take care of people and provide social safety nets. That's the role of the states, as provided by the 10th Amendment.

I absolutely do. It is brazen hypocrisy.

But let's not only convict the liberal progressives of this.
 

VN Store



Back
Top