How does the far right deal with Romney's heritage and religion?

#2
#2
I don't think anybody cares about the Mexican part (I didn't even know about it, and I live in UT). I think they are willing to overlook the Mormon part.
 
#5
#5
nbakerld said:
I don't think anybody cares about the Mexican part (I didn't even know about it, and I live in UT). I think they are willing to overlook the Mormon part.
Click to expand...


Kind of undermines some of the subtext on Obama's father, don't you think?
 
#7
#7
nbakerld said:
I don't really get your point.
Click to expand...


Gsvol posted on here about some lawsuit about Obama's birth certificate moving forward and argument from the plaintiff lunatics had changed from, he has to have been born in the US to, he had to have been born of people born in the US.

Apparently, these brainiacs claimed that this was what the founders meant when they referred to being born a US citizen.

Now, I pointed out that there was a slight glitch in that theory in that, by definition, George Washington and probably some others after him could not have been born of US citizens since the US did not exist when they were born (ergo cannot be born of US citizens).

Naturally, he has ignored that little problem.

My point being here, I would assume these same righteous folks are going to sue Romney since his father was not, at least originally, a US citizen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#8
#8
lawgator1 said:
Gsvol posted on here about some lawsuit about Obama's birth certificate moving forward and argument from the plaintiff lunatics had changed from, he has to have been born in the US to, he had to have been born of people born in the US.

Apparently, these brainiacs claimed that this was what the founders meant when they referred to being born a US citizen.

Now, I pointed out that there was a slight glitch in that theory in that, by definition, George Washington and probably some others after him could not have been born of US citizens since the US did not exist when they were born (ergo cannot be born of US citizens).

Naturally, he has ignored that little problem.

My point being here, I would assume these same righteous folks are going to sue Romney since his father was not, at least originally, a US citizen.
Click to expand...
:eek:lol:
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#9
#9
lawgator1 said:
Gsvol posted on here about some lawsuit about Obama's birth certificate moving forward and argument from the plaintiff lunatics had changed from, he has to have been born in the US to, he had to have been born of people born in the US.

Apparently, these brainiacs claimed that this was what the founders meant when they referred to being born a US citizen.

Now, I pointed out that there was a slight glitch in that theory in that, by definition, George Washington and probably some others after him could not have been born of US citizens since the US did not exist when they were born (ergo cannot be born of US citizens).

Naturally, he has ignored that little problem.

My point being here, I would assume these same righteous folks are going to sue Romney since his father was not, at least originally, a US citizen.
Click to expand...

:crazy:
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#10
#10
lawgator1 said:
Gsvol posted on here about some lawsuit about Obama's birth certificate moving forward and argument from the plaintiff lunatics had changed from, he has to have been born in the US to, he had to have been born of people born in the US.

Apparently, these brainiacs claimed that this was what the founders meant when they referred to being born a US citizen.

Now, I pointed out that there was a slight glitch in that theory in that, by definition, George Washington and probably some others after him could not have been born of US citizens since the US did not exist when they were born (ergo cannot be born of US citizens).

Naturally, he has ignored that little problem.

My point being here, I would assume these same righteous folks are going to sue Romney since his father was not, at least originally, a US citizen.
Click to expand...

Wasn't the first one to sue (and maybe the only one, I am not sure) a Dem and a Hillary supporter?
 
#11
#11
Evangelicals won't like it, but then they'll hold their nose and head to the polls because he's got an R past his name. As I've already heard some say: "Better a Mormon than a Muslim."
 
#13
#13
lawgator1 said:
Now, I pointed out that there was a slight glitch in that theory in that, by definition, George Washington and probably some others after him could not have been born of US citizens since the US did not exist when they were born (ergo cannot be born of US citizens).

.
Click to expand...
No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President
Click to expand...

not sure about what you are trying to get at there
 
#15
#15
lawgator1 said:
Gsvol posted on here about some lawsuit about Obama's birth certificate moving forward and argument from the plaintiff lunatics had changed from, he has to have been born in the US to, he had to have been born of people born in the US.

Apparently, these brainiacs claimed that this was what the founders meant when they referred to being born a US citizen.

Now, I pointed out that there was a slight glitch in that theory in that, by definition, George Washington and probably some others after him could not have been born of US citizens since the US did not exist when they were born (ergo cannot be born of US citizens).

Naturally, he has ignored that little problem.

My point being here, I would assume these same righteous folks are going to sue Romney since his father was not, at least originally, a US citizen.
Click to expand...

nice try counselor but I suggest you go brief the Georgia decision. His dad was a citizen at time of mitt's birth. Obama's dad was not. That is the issue in the Georgia case.

Not a birther but the definition of natural born citizen needs to be clarified.
 
#16
#16
NEOCON said:
Ah hell no????!!!!!

He's Mexican too????


Damn, and I had just gotten over the golden spectacles thing.

:dance:
Click to expand...

LG is just baiting. His parents were living in Mexico, but were not mexican citizens. They retained their american citizenship. His dad was not mexican. (not that I care if he was)
 
#18
#18
vols4sure said:
nice try counselor but I suggest you go brief the Georgia decision. His dad was a citizen at time of mitt's birth. Obama's dad was not. That is the issue in the Georgia case.

Not a birther but the definition of natural born citizen needs to be clarified.
Click to expand...

So weak
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top