I can’t be the only one…

#1

zjcvols

"On a Tennessee Saturday night."
Staff member
Joined
Jul 7, 2008
Messages
89,435
Likes
37,925
#1
Whose excitement for college football is slightly dwindled because of the SEC’s absolute ridiculous inability to do a 9 game schedule this year. It boggles my mind that UT could have a game in Kyle Field or against LSU or even against Texas, but because of a couple coaches being scared and Sankey’s craving a few extra bucks, we have a 8 game schedule that doesn’t make much sense.

Not having a 9 game conference schedule for the next two years is absolutely criminal.
 
#2
#2
Criminal? No don't think so. Current thinking is 9 game model with 3 permanent plus 6 rotating. How those 3 permanent are set is tough. Having a balanced competitive league is the issue.

Early leaks had Alabama's 3P games against LSU, Auburn, and Tennessee.
How does that measure up to against a possible Georgia's 3P of Florida, Auburn, and Kentucky or Tennessee. Texas already wants permanent with AR, OU and Texas A&M.
 
  • Like
Reactions: swampfoxfan
#3
#3
I'm sort of with you. At this stage I'd rather the SEC go to 20, then split the conference back into divisions of 10 with one division being pre-1992 SEC and the other all of the post-1992 additions. 9 game round robin in the division, then the two winners can play for the conference title.
 
#4
#4
Honestly? Who cares at this point? I have a bad feeling we are gonna see more new members in the next few years after the ACC implodes anyway

Really don't mind the league just laying back a bit to see what happens before fully opening the kimono.

Would rather see one big drastic change all taking place at one time than a few years of ping-pong changing rules
 
#6
#6
Really don't mind the league just laying back a bit to see what happens before fully opening the kimono.
Reminds me of Rush's kimono phase.

20200401-120730-4cbe20de-26ea-4a6f-a969-c762ab8f0c58.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chad F
#7
#7
Whose excitement for college football is slightly dwindled because of the SEC’s absolute ridiculous inability to do a 9 game schedule this year. It boggles my mind that UT could have a game in Kyle Field or against LSU or even against Texas, but because of a couple coaches being scared and Sankey’s craving a few extra bucks, we have a 8 game schedule that doesn’t make much sense.

Not having a 9 game conference schedule for the next two years is absolutely criminal.
If we go to 9 probably won’t see as many games like UT/NC St, AL/Wisc, TX/Mich or LSU/USC. So I think it would be a trade off.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vol in Buckeye Land
#8
#8
We probably have the 3rd best schedule in the SEC behind Mizzou and Ole Miss.

I feel we do no worse than 4th in SEC this season.
 
#9
#9
Criminal? No don't think so. Current thinking is 9 game model with 3 permanent plus 6 rotating. How those 3 permanent are set is tough. Having a balanced competitive league is the issue.

Early leaks had Alabama's 3P games against LSU, Auburn, and Tennessee.
How does that measure up to against a possible Georgia's 3P of Florida, Auburn, and Kentucky or Tennessee. Texas already wants permanent with AR, OU and Texas A&M.
If Georgia gets those three I would hope florida becomes the florida of the 90s. I'm just an older than dirt fan that misses the old pre Missouri ,Arkansas Texas AM days, get off my lawn
 
#11
#11
I'm sort of with you. At this stage I'd rather the SEC go to 20, then split the conference back into divisions of 10 with one division being pre-1992 SEC and the other all of the post-1992 additions. 9 game round robin in the division, then the two winners can play for the conference title.

They could split us into 2 divisions and call one division "Leaders" and one division "Legends"
 

VN Store



Back
Top