If a&m joins and fsu,clemson,and Missouri doesnt what will happen

#3
#3
There are plenty of options for team #14. The top two that come to mind (apart from your listing) are Virginia Tech and North Carolina State. VT has publicly denied interest, but public denials mean nothing. We'll see.
 
#4
#4
i think we shouldnt add anyone i love the way we are i think it will just make are conference more weak.
 
#6
#6
UTCVol said:
What?
Click to expand...

because almost all of the teams in the conference are very good besides UK and vandy..... If we ass Missouri and a&m those are 2 teams they cant compete with the sec and clemson is way overated the only good team we would be adding would be FSU!
 
#7
#7
THE SOZ said:
because almost all of the teams in the conference are very good besides UK and vandy..... If we ass Missouri and a&m those are 2 teams they cant compete with the sec and clemson is way overated the only good team we would be adding would be FSU!
Click to expand...

A&M, Missouri, and Clemson are all better than South Carolina was when we added them.
 
#8
#8
Im just saying i dont think we should mess with the conference when we are already the best
 
#9
#9
A&M is a solid choice, however im not in favor of adding Mizzou. IMO it should be A&M and Oklahoma for the west, FSU and Miami for the East. Miami has been down in recent years, but they're still a top program and would bring more to the table than Clemson.
 
#12
#12
No ACC team will be taken....so that leaves us with either Mizzou or maybe WVU who I think would be a nice addition
 
#15
#15
There's an idea floating around that Missouri is waiting for the A&M deal to become official to take political heat off A&M from their state legislature. After A&M is officially in, Missouri follows suit.
This is speculation, but it's pretty good speculation imo. A&M will be under significant political pressure if it looks like the Big 12 might blow up. By waiting, Missouri provides them the pretense the Big 12 is still relatively healthy and then they join after the dust settles.
Once again, this is only speculation, but given the situation in Texas I think it makes a lot of sense. It will be interesting to see how this plays out.
 
#16
#16
THE SOZ said:
because almost all of the teams in the conference are very good besides UK and vandy..... If we ass Missouri and a&m those are 2 teams they cant compete with the sec and clemson is way overated the only good team we would be adding would be FSU!
Click to expand...

Vandy, Kentucky, MSU, Miss and SCar have been relatively non-competitive in football since the last SEC expansion. Two division titles between the five teams and I don't think a one of them has a cumulative in-conference record above .400 in nearly twenty years.

If Muschamp and Dooley don't pan out, and Richt ends up getting fired (and I could very easily see at least two of those three things happening), Clemson could be an early favorite to win the east right away.
 
#17
#17
THE SOZ said:
because almost all of the teams in the conference are very good besides UK and vandy..... If we ass Missouri and a&m those are 2 teams they cant compete with the sec and clemson is way overated the only good team we would be adding would be FSU!
Click to expand...

:eek:lol:
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top