"If We Elect Romney, A Lot Of People Will Die"

#2
#2
We could probably get some data that shows a bunch of people died while Obama was president.
 
#3
#3
Couple of quotes from the article.

If Romney is elected "alot of people will die" and "Obamacare will save, literally, thousands of lives."
 
#7
#7
Typical liberal tactics. Make a remark that Romney killed or will kill lots of people, and then completely ignore the fact that such inflammatory language was used while demanding a real discussion. If you start your argument with a statement as ridiculous as this, then you can't be surprised if somebody will not have a serious conversation with you.
 
#8
#8
the stupidity of the statement is on par with whoopi goldberg asking mccain whether he would reinstitute slavery if elected.
 
#9
#9
Meanwhile, Obama's unprecedented number of drone strikes (that I'm certain Romney would maintain) are killing innocent people.
 
#11
#11
n_huffhines said:
Meanwhile, Obama's unprecedented number of drone strikes (that I'm certain Romney would maintain) are killing innocent people.
Click to expand...

if the GOP is serious about beating Obama, they should sabotage him. Ann Coulter, rush limbaugh, hannity, etc. should come out in support of his neo-con policies.

"mr. president, we support all of the GWB policies you have extended ..."

it would be a total mind eff
 
#12
#12
dreVol said:
if the GOP is serious about beating Obama, they should sabotage him. Ann Coulter, rush limbaugh, hannity, etc. should come out in support of his neo-con policies.

"mr. president, we support that you've ramped up all of the GWB policies ..."

it would be a total mind eff
Click to expand...

fyp
 
#13
#13
It's like saying (except this is the truth) "Not one person who has ever eaten at McDonalds will survive!"
 
#15
#15
SamRebel35 said:
Typical liberal tactics. Make a remark that Romney killed or will kill lots of people, and then completely ignore the fact that such inflammatory language was used while demanding a real discussion. If you start your argument with a statement as ridiculous as this, then you can't be surprised if somebody will not have a serious conversation with you.
Click to expand...

Liberal? Come on, the conservative queen coined "death panels." Give me a break.
 
#17
#17
TruthIsOutThere said:
Liberal? Come on, the conservative queen coined "death panels." Give me a break.
Click to expand...

OrangeEmpire said:
Help me out, who?
Click to expand...

he's referring to Sarah Palin, and while "death panels" is a tad hyperbolic, the stimulus bill set up committees that would establish cost and benefit guidelines for treatment that would be based on life expectancy, cost of medication, and so forth

edit:

also, it's estimated by either the CBO or GAO (not sure which) that even after the ACA is fully implemented, 30 million will still be without coverage, so the ACA solves nothing
 
Last edited:
#18
#18
MG1968 said:
he's referring to Sarah Palin, and while "death panels" is a tad hyperbolic, the stimulus bill set up committees that would establish cost and benefit guidelines for treatment that would be based on life expectancy, cost of medication, and so forth

edit:

also, it's estimated by either the CBO or GAO (not sure which) that even after the ACA is fully implemented, 30 million will still be without coverage, so the ACA solves nothing
Click to expand...

We already have cost/benefit analysis. Regardless, my goal was not to throw stones as Palin, but just to point out that all sides engage in a dangerous rhetoric game that obscures the truth. Both sides guilty and both sides need the boot.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top