If you could add one amendment

Which of these hypothetical Constitutional Amendments is most important to you?


  • Total voters
    0
#1

RespectTradition

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2010
Messages
1,831
Likes
7
#1
If you could add one of these amendments, which would it be?

Balanced budget amendment - Phrased properly to allow for legitimate emergencies, but force Congress to stay within its means the rest of the time.

Term limits - set limits to how long a congresscritter can set up camp in Washington.

Positive rights (right to food, housing, healthcare) - Added this one just to give progressives a choice.

Redefine the Commerce Clause to its intended limits - this would severely limit what congress could do since most of what they do now was forbidden until FDR and his tame SC warped it beyond all recognition.

Single Topic Bills (ie, can't ban internet gambling in a port security bill) - I get so sick of riders added to bills that have nothing to do with it but if you don't like the rider, then you have voted against the 'save billy bill' and are a heartless bastard.

Make wealth redistribution illegal - simply put, no taking money from people and giving it to others. This can be welfare, entitlements, backed loans, subsidies, etc.

Cap taxes at X - set a hard upper limit on what taxes can be. As I recall, the taxes that were considered so onerous and led to the American Revolution were under 10%, isn't that interesting?

Gay Marriage Amendment - would you outlaw Gay Marriage if you could?
 
#3
#3
I have never like Line Item Veto. I don't see how it can work. Imagine, you want something in a bill, I want something. We compromise, give and take, work together and pass a bill we can both agree with. Then, the president, who agrees with me, line items out those things that were important to you, without which, you would not have helped pass the bill. How is that good? Obama could let them pass the bill to raise the debt ceiling and then veto the parts about cutting the budget. Or am I missing something?
 
#5
#5
Repeal the direct election of Senators and mandate a Representative to constituent ratio of no more than 200,000:1.

Or repeal the income tax amendment.
 
#9
#9
I thought all you Tea Party types were adamant about NOT changing the Constitution.

Actually, I think most of the 'Tea Party types' are for using the constitution the way it was intended, which includes amending it when necessary. There is a big difference between wanting our government to obey the constitution and thinking the constitution itself must be set in stone.
 
#10
#10
I'd like to see an amendment that bans the formation of government labor unions and also makes the federal government a neutral 3rd party when it comes to labor/management disputes in the private sector. This Amendment should also repeal the Wagner Act.
 
#11
#11
I'd like to see an amendment that bans the formation of government labor unions and also makes the federal government a neutral 3rd party when it comes to labor/management disputes in the private sector. This Amendment should also repeal the Wagner Act.

:yes:
 
#12
#12
something about privacy of the consumer/customer


so that companies can't just take our personal information and sell/give it to whomsoever they please (or do whatsoever with it they please)
 
#14
#14
I thought all you Tea Party types were adamant about NOT changing the Constitution.

Ouch. Way off. Kind of bothers me how far off this is. T-Partyers aren't against legally and properly changing the constitution. They're against a "living" constitution where the meaning is subject to the whims of government planners.
 

VN Store



Back
Top