I'm not one to complain about officiating in a game

#1
VolsFan4Ever-11

VolsFan4Ever-11

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2010
Messages
6,867
Likes
2
#1
But that was one of the worst halves of officiating i've ever seen in my life. Wow is pretty much all i can say.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#2
#2
1. We outrebounded them by 11.
2. We went to the rim more.

Can someone explain to me how you can do both of those have 13 fouls against 5? 19 FTs shot vs. 5?
 
#3
#3
It couldn't even wait until the end of the game. It's like clockwork.
 
#4
#4
Yea this is horrible, Charlotte game was similiar, but we HAVE to win this game, so they are going to have to play through it. Ole Miss sucks, refs have kept them in the game, 16-19 from the free throw line. Tennessee is playing hard, but McBee needs to get out. He is playing like crap on both sides of the floor. Besides the brick at the end, Golden at least looks confident and is moving the ball well. Tobias has gotta start converting downlow, he is 2/9 and is missing easy looks, although it looks like he got fouled on some of them. Regardless, if he made 2-3 more shots, we would be winning.
 
#5
#5
atxvol2010 said:
Yea this is horrible, Charlotte game was similiar, but we HAVE to win this game, so they are going to have to play through it. Ole Miss sucks, refs have kept them in the game, 16-19 from the free throw line. Tennessee is playing hard, but McBee needs to get out. He is playing like crap on both sides of the floor. Besides the brick at the end, Golden at least looks confident and is moving the ball well. Tobias has gotta start converting downlow, he is 2/9 and is missing easy looks, although it looks like he got fouled on some of them. Regardless, if he made 2-3 more shots, we would be winning.
Click to expand...

This brought to you by Captain Obvious
 
#7
#7
Yeah, that's definitely as bad as I've seen all season. I'm still not sure how tripping over a guy is an intentional foul.
 
#9
#9
Incipient said:
Yeah, that's definitely as bad as I've seen all season. I'm still not sure how tripping over a guy is an intentional foul.
Click to expand...

He didn't trip over the guy. He went to jump and stepped on him. If the angle he had made it appear that he could have easily cleared the guy and purposefully stepped down, then the correct call was made. The game is tied because we played sloppy.
 
#10
#10
crusse10 said:
He didn't trip over the guy. He went to jump and stepped on him. If the angle he had made it appear that he could have easily cleared the guy and purposefully stepped down, then the correct call was made. The game is tied because we played sloppy.
Click to expand...

When you're trying to run and step on somebody on the ground, this causing you to lose your balance, that constitutes tripping over them.

And the game is tied because they've outscored us by 12 from the free throw line.
 
#11
#11
crusse10 said:
He didn't trip over the guy. He went to jump and stepped on him. If the angle he had made it appear that he could have easily cleared the guy and purposefully stepped down, then the correct call was made. The game is tied because we played sloppy.
Click to expand...

GOINSTOMP.gif.pagespeed.ce.zBB5PTo50s.gif


I think this kind of confirms your opinion.
 
#12
#12
Incipient said:
When you're trying to run and step on somebody on the ground, this causing you to lose your balance, that constitutes tripping over them.

And the game is tied because they've outscored us by 12 from the free throw line.
Click to expand...

He didn't run and trip. He stopped, then jumped, then stepped before he cleared the guy. I can understand why the call was made. Instead, we had 2 intentional fouls called against us (one of which led to a 5 point play). That's playing sloppy.
 
#17
#17
Yes, definitely a much better second half by the officials, they didn't call touch fouls that got Ole Miss the majority of their points in the first half.
 
#18
#18
The only thing that kept Ole Miss in the game in the first half was foul shots. I would kill (almost) for our guys to shoot FT as well as they do.
 
#19
#19
gorockytop101 said:
GOINSTOMP.gif.pagespeed.ce.zBB5PTo50s.gif


I think this kind of confirms your opinion.
Click to expand...

Clip is worthless because you can't see if the Tennessee player is looking at the game or the player. Doesn't confirm anything except you agree with the opinion. Do you have a clip that shows the entire shot? That might be some evidence.
 
#20
#20
bUTrosbUTrosVOLie said:
Clip is worthless because you can't see if the Tennessee player is looking at the game or the player. Doesn't confirm anything except you agree with the opinion. Do you have a clip that shows the entire shot? That might be some evidence.
Click to expand...

He knew exactly where he was and stepped on him. No way was it 100% accident. He just got humiliated. Give it up. The call was right.
 
#21
#21
The other angle shown on TV is telling. It didn't appear intentional from the other angle.
 
#23
#23
crusse10 said:
He knew exactly where he was and stepped on him. No way was it 100% accident. He just got humiliated. Give it up. The call was right.
Click to expand...

Convenient the clip that actually shows it could very well be unintentional isn't posted here (the typical full court view they showed right after showing this one on TV) - yet the sketchy clip is posted.
 
#24
#24
Bassmanbruno said:
Convenient the clip that actually shows it could very well be unintentional isn't posted here (the typical full court view they showed right after showing this one on TV) - yet the sketchy clip is posted.
Click to expand...

I didn't post it. Even considering the other view that you're referring to, the only thing you can say is that he didn't bend his head down to see that the player was there. To assume that you have to physically move your head to know you're about to step on someone who you know is directly next to you is ridiculous. He knew what he was doing.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top