lawgator1
Senior Member
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2005
- Messages
- 72,409
- Likes
- 42,778
That's almost, again almost, as absurd as some unqualified moron saying his relevant experience to be CEO of our land is as unaccountable, unresponsible community organizer.Hypocrisy is the basis of politics... however, Palin and the GOP are making it more prevalent.
LOL. "Mayor of a city with a population of...... 9,000 people!"
That's almost, again almost, as absurd as some unqualified moron saying his relevant experience to be CEO of our land is as unaccountable, unresponsible community organizer.
Think about how stupid that sounds.
It's even more absurd to try and paint McCain and Palin as warmongers.Are you commenting on Obama's "lack" of qualifications? Personally, I'd rather have someone young running for the office. Someone that has vision and carries himself like Obama does, over someone that wouldn't mind going to war at the sound of a gunshot. Palin was quoted as saying she would support a war against Russia... and you all know that McCain would be the one to get us there.
Are you commenting on Obama's "lack" of qualifications? Personally, I'd rather have someone young running for the office. Someone that has vision and carries himself like Obama does, over someone that wouldn't mind going to war at the sound of a gunshot. Palin was quoted as saying she would support a war against Russia... and you all know that McCain would be the one to get us there.
Are you commenting on Obama's "lack" of qualifications? Personally, I'd rather have someone young running for the office. Someone that has vision and carries himself like Obama does, over someone that wouldn't mind going to war at the sound of a gunshot. Palin was quoted as saying she would support a war against Russia... and you all know that McCain would be the one to get us there.
Putin prefers that we be passive as well. The Iranian Sheiks prefer same. The last totally passive maroon we put up there gave us the Iranian hostage crisis with ensuing debacle in the desert. No thanks.Get us into a war that we cannot and will not win, or get us out of Iraq and back on track to being the best country in the world? I'll take my chances with Obama. Considering he has Biden on his team means that we have a good chance of having positive relations with countries. I prefer passiveness.
Get us into a war that we cannot and will not win, or get us out of Iraq and back on track to being the best country in the world? I'll take my chances with Obama. Considering he has Biden on his team means that we have a good chance of having positive relations with countries. I prefer passiveness.
Putin prefers that we be passive as well. The Iranian Sheiks prefer same. The last totally passive maroon we put up there gave us the Iranian hostage crisis with ensuing debacle in the desert. No thanks.
Using the past tense end of Iraq to justify a vote about going forward is senseless, given that the crew that hauled us to Iraq, whom you likely agreed with at the time, will be out of power.
Any mention of Biden as a positive to anything should probably warrant banishment from the politics forum.
Positive relations is a red herring. We want beneficial relations - to us.
Governor of the largest state; with a high approval rating.