Instant Replay Holes

#1

byobbio

I hate instant replay.
Joined
Jan 23, 2009
Messages
1,511
Likes
73
#1
OK, so here's a time to pick on the glorious Replay rule. Remember, there are so many times that an official's judgement can be proven wrong with a 2-dimensional pixelated replay. Nevermind that the official has a 3-d, up-close look firsthand. Take a look at this article:
Toledo Rockets say win should be awarded over Syracuse Orange due to refs' error - ESPN

To me, this proves the point that one wrongly-overturned call makes the whole idea of instant Replay invalid and the rule should be scrapped immediately. Video cannot provide the ultimate perfect image of what happened. It should no longer be part of the human-played game. Should never have been.

There are several reasons:
1. TV is only 2-d.
2. Referees are part of the game. Their calls are based on how the game is going and yes that is part of the game.
3. It slows the game time.
4. Less time for football more time for commercials.
5. We now run the clock after out-of-bounds losing more football.
6. Reviewing every play is nerve-racking for the officials on the field. It distorts their judgement.
7. Calls are made based solely with backup judgement in mind. Thus, the quicker the team gets ready, the less likely a call is overturned.
8. Rarely has a game been decided correctly that would not have been had it not been for the cameras.
9. It allows more politics to come into play. (See Big 12 Championship game two years ago)
10. It has simply made the game less enjoyable as a fan.

BTW, check out the rule about "When the referee declares that the game has ended, the score is final." How sick is that to hear?
 
#2
#2
When the officials in the replay booths learn what indisputable means instant replay will be fixed.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#5
#5
I'm trying to follow the logic.

The officials screwed up a call, therefore we should take away the only means we have of correcting erroneous calls.

Makes sense.
 
#6
#6
There were no politics involved in that big 12 game.

The only legitimate reason one can remotely argue "Texas should have lost" is "I dont like Texas"
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#7
#7
Instant replay also has nothing to do with number 5. Nor is "more commercials" caused by such

And I'm not completely sure what you're getting at with #7
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
Last edited:
#8
#8
Before replay, the dominant discussions on Sunday morning were the blown calls. That has been cut down 90% and I woud never want to go back.
 
#9
#9
The only argument that carries any weight is #3.

I'm fine with a game taking a few extra minutes to make sure they get calls right.
 
#10
#10
It is what it is...any time there is a human interaction involved, there will be mistakes.

The replay system does a great job of getting more humans involved in the process, therby decreasing the chances for a mistake to happen.
 
#11
#11
OP would be the first to curse the day if UT lost on a play that could have been reversed by instant replay and it wasn't there.
 
#12
#12
I am old enough to have started watching football when there was only one camera, instant replay was only used on big plays, and only shown one time between plays, and NFL telecasts fixed a camera at the 50 for the entire halftime showing some band play (we usually went outside for a quick game during that). Officiating never was a next day discussion. Calls were just accepted as what they were. There was no basis for the home viewer to think anything different happened than what was called. Part of me actually remembers that as more enjoyable than all the technology, situational rules and delays that have been implemented into the game.
 
#13
#13
Sports traditionalists are hilarious.

Very nice categorical comment. However, just because it is new and "innovative" doesn't mean shi_. I would much rather watch football than some stupid mouthbreather in the booth trying to decide whether or not some wr has one foot down and the ball in his hand for a split second so it is either 3rd and short or long during the 3rd quarter of a blowout game between Boise State and University of Idaho. It just doesn't interest me and i think it detracts from an otherwise perfect spectator sport.
 
#14
#14
Nor is "more commercials" caused by such
You really think that?

Jeff Fisher outs the NFL for having referees asking coaches to take time-outs, can't do that anymore. Let's just review every score instead.

They have "reviewed" very obvious touchdowns and taken commercial breaks.
 
#16
#16
I am old enough to have started watching football when there was only one camera, instant replay was only used on big plays, and only shown one time between plays, and NFL telecasts fixed a camera at the 50 for the entire halftime showing some band play (we usually went outside for a quick game during that). Officiating never was a next day discussion. Calls were just accepted as what they were. There was no basis for the home viewer to think anything different happened than what was called. Part of me actually remembers that as more enjoyable than all the technology, situational rules and delays that have been implemented into the game.

In a way I agree, but I also remember screaming at the TV that a ref blew a call that was obvious and there was no way to change it.

I'll take my chances with the replays.
 
#17
#17
In a way I agree, but I also remember screaming at the TV that a ref blew a call that was obvious and there was no way to change it.

I'll take my chances with the replays.

If you think the instant replay will eliminate all the screaming at the refs, you are sadly misstaken.
 
#18
#18
If you think the instant replay will eliminate all the screaming at the refs, you are sadly misstaken.

That would be a great point if that were the argument. Of course it's not going to eliminate ref rage because judgement calls still exist and those are not reviewable.
 

VN Store



Back
Top