Jayson Swain Comments

#1

WA_Vol

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 9, 2005
Messages
18,663
Likes
12
#1
Read his comments below. Sounds like the whole team is frustrated.


UT offense struggles to get untracked

Vols didn't think points would be problem

By CHRIS LOW
Staff Writer


KNOXVILLE — Tennessee's offense might give a grade-school defense some problems, but that's about it.

At least, that was junior receiver Jayson Swain's scathing assessment yesterday in the aftermath of one of the Vols' most ineffective offensive performances in a marquee Southeastern Conference game of the Phillip Fulmer era.




"It's a shame that my middle school team could probably defend this offense right now," said Swain, summing up the frustration swirling in the Tennessee camp from Saturday's 16-7 loss at Florida.

"It's just a shame with all the talent that we have. We need to sit down and figure it out."

Fulmer said he's as surprised as anybody that the Vols have had so much trouble scoring points in their first two games. This despite having virtually everybody back from an offense that dissected Texas A&M in the Cotton Bowl last season.

He's not standing pat, though.

Fulmer said yesterday that he's ditching the two-quarterback system and that Erik Ainge would be his quarterback for the duration this Saturday against LSU.

"That's absolutely no reflection on Rick (Clausen), because certainly he can help our football team win," Fulmer said. "He's validated himself as a quarterback. We've got to get on the same page from a timing standpoint, from nobody looking over their shoulder all the time, and go on about our business as a team.

"I've addressed (Ainge and Clausen) about it. I've addressed the seniors and the leadership on this football team, and the team is looking forward to going on about our business that way and being a better team."

Fulmer made it clear that he thinks LSU will be the toughest test yet for his team, which managed just 213 yards of total offense against Florida.

The Vols, who rank last in the SEC and 107th nationally in scoring offense, have been shut out in the second half in each of their first two games.

The 24 points scored in those two games are their fewest in the first two games of a season since being blasted 44-0 by Georgia and 43-7 by Southern Cal to open the 1981 season.

For those with short memories, the Vols played in the Garden State Bowl that season.

"We're playing a much-better football team this week than UAB or Florida," Fulmer said. "We've got our work cut out for us to be able to effectively run the football, protect, defend or whatever."

Swain said communication lapses killed the Vols in the first two games. He said there was no other way to describe the offense right now than underachieving.

"Anybody in kindergarten can watch the game and see there was a lot of miscommunication in the game," Swain said. "So there's a lot of work the receivers need to do and a lot of work the quarterbacks need to do.

"It's not all on the receivers, because there were times when we were one or two steps behind the defensive backs. We were really excited to have press man-to-man coverage, and the quarterback didn't get it to us. Then the quarterbacks rely on us, and for whatever reason, we did not get open to complete the pass."

Sophomore receiver Robert Meachem refused to weigh in on what effect shuffling two quarterbacks in and out of the game had on the Vols' timing and continuity.

"You'd have to talk to Coach Fulmer and the coaches about that situation," said Meachem, who was slowed against the Gators by an ankle injury.

That said, Meachem said it's time the Vols get on the "same page" offensively and live up to their grandiose preseason billing.

"I think we all need to come together and just have fun," he said. "A lot of people were too uptight. I don't know if the magazines were getting to them or what, but I don't think their heads were in it at the time."

LSU gave up 461 passing yards to Arizona State in its 35-31 win over the Sun Devils two weeks ago in Tempe, Ariz.

On the surface, that sounds enticing for the Vols, but their longest play from scrimmage thus far is just 19 yards.

They appeared to find a rhythm running the ball against Florida in the second quarter.

In fact, eight of their 15 running plays by the tailback in the first half went for
8 yards or longer. But they drifted away from the running game in the second half, when Gerald Riggs Jr. got just six carries after rushing for 73 yards on 11 carries in the first half.

Finding an identity offensively would seem to be critical if the Vols are going to get back into the Eastern Division race.

Right now, after an entire preseason and two games, Fulmer conceded that they don't have one.

"I don't think we've established ourselves as to what we want to be yet," Fulmer said.
 
#3
#3
I don't know why people are making sucha big deal out of it.
 
#4
#4
Originally posted by GAVol@Sep 21, 2005 2:02 PM
I don't know why people are making sucha big deal out of it.
[snapback]148115[/snapback]​

well he kinda just dissed the offense and the playcalling as if to say its not better then a highschool team.
 
#6
#6
That's definitely something to consider. I think holding this team together and regrouping may be CPF's biggest challenge since 2002.
 
#7
#7
I think they will get it together though. Everything that I have read so far has pointed to the decision to play Ainge at QB.

Some of the quotes that Ainge provided led me to think that this choice has calmed him down some. He seems very confident now.

I think that he even went as far to say that he dared LSU's DB's to play man in the upcoming game.
 
#8
#8
You might be right. Hopefully, settling on a QB will be the catalyst for pulling the offense together. You would think that it's just a matter of time. It's not like these same guys haven't been successful before.
 
#9
#9
Not everyone on the team agreed on Ainge being the starter, but I think it was a majority. However, all of them have said that it's nice to know who it's going to be and they are all ready to support Ainge and do whatever possible to help him and the team win.

If this doesn't pull the offfense together, I don't know what will. It's about all they have.
 
#10
#10
The thing is, this isn't some ragtag bunch. These guys have been successful before and will be again. I HOPE that down the road we look back and realize that the 2 QB system caused a lot of the problems and that UAB and Florida both have good defenses.
 
#11
#11
Yeah I agree. We know for a fact that they all have the ability. They're just not on the same page. A few have said just that themselves. To be honest, they weren't on the same page last year either, but they were a lot more productive.

I still think the biggest problem in our passing game is timing. I mean think about it. They are used to catching balls from Clausen and Ainge back and forth. Ainge gets the ball there a lot quicker and harder than Clausen.

You can't tell me that catching a long ball from Rick and then one from Ainge won't throw your timing off. With Clausen I would say they had to adjust by slowing down and with Ainge it's just the opposite.

But what do I know.
 
#12
#12
It's not just a matter of naming a starter and all of our problems will go away.

We have to remember that the NCAA limits the time that teams can practice. Which means, each player gets a limited amount of snaps under center. In most instances the starting QB is named near the end of summer practice and the starter begins to take 80% of the snaps with the first team.

That has not been the case. Now we're into game 3 with a QB who has taken no more than 50% of the snaps in practice and that is a big handicap at this point.

It may take more than a week of practice for this offense to settle into a rythm.

We may pay for the indecision of the coaches for a while to come.

It's just a thought.
 
#13
#13
You're right, naming a QB is not a cure all.

One thing that strangely might work in our favor is that the deteriorating weather is going to probably demand that we run the ball 50 times Saturday night.
 
#14
#14
That's a good point OldVol and I agree with that.

Just speaking Aingenese here, I think that his biggest problem other than not getting more snaps in practice was his confidence. His first drive in that UF game was nice. It shut the swamp up some and you know it worried UM that he was able to come out and do that.

I know if (God Forbid) I was the QB, I would not feel so confident if I found good rhythm, drove down the field to score and was replaced again after that. It was the same in the UAB game.

I think that other than timing and snap counts, for a young guy like Ainge it's as much about the confidence as anything.

I guess we will see how it all goes in 3 days.
 
#16
#16
Whatever it takes to get this group of guys more in sync is what I would expect a coaching staff with the experience we have to do. I haven't hardly heard from anyone that says the two quarterback system is good unless they are so unique that the D has to play them differently. So why does Coach Fulmer play the two qb game when, with his experience, he should know it doesn't work. Anyway, I am glad Ainge is in there but I agree with OldVol that it may take some time for the timing to correct itself.
 
#17
#17
So why does Coach Fulmer play the two qb game when, with his experience, he should know it doesn't work.


We have a history of auditioning QBs on the fly. We did it with Manning/Stewart/Helton. We did it with Matthews/Clausen/Suggs.
 
#18
#18
Originally posted by 7IlikeOrange7@Sep 21, 2005 2:05 PM
well he kinda just dissed the offense and the playcalling as if to say its not better then a highschool team.
[snapback]148119[/snapback]​

seems as if the players are as frustrated with this offense as we fans are....does anyone have cutcliffes number?
 
#19
#19
Originally posted by indyvol15@Sep 21, 2005 3:43 PM
seems as if the players are as frustrated with this offense as we fans are....does anyone have cutcliffes number?
[snapback]148170[/snapback]​

This will only be the tip of the iceberg. Imagine the conversations between the backs and recievers in Gibbs Hall, wow! :focus:
 
#21
#21
Originally posted by NCGatorBait@Sep 21, 2005 7:40 PM
UT just needs to go back to it's bread and butter and it will be fine. :peace2:
[snapback]148206[/snapback]​



AMEN!!! i cant speak for anybody else but i LOVED the days when we had 80-yard drives and ran the ball EVERY play to score and then we would pass every once in a while just to let people know the pass is still there if we want to go to it. and if i recall correctly like everybody else has on this board our "bread and butter" was working pretty freaking good against UF in the first half
 
#22
#22
Originally posted by IBleedOrange@Sep 21, 2005 6:50 PM
AMEN!!!  i cant speak for anybody else but i LOVED the days when we had 80-yard drives and ran the ball EVERY play to score and then we would pass every once in a while just to let people know the pass is still there if we want to go to it.  and if i recall correctly like everybody else has on this board our "bread and butter" was working pretty freaking good against UF in the first half
[snapback]148209[/snapback]​

Whatever happened to the days when we would throw at least 3 different RB's at a defenseto keep them honest??
 
#23
#23
We will see if LSU is better than UF on Oct 15th. The only reason he said that is if he wins, he is a genius for beating a better team. If he loses, well that should be expect since LSU is "better" than UF. Don't let Phil lull you guys into accepting a lose before it happens. Go kick the hell out of LSU.
 
#24
#24
lsu is better then florida imo. only thing that will prove me otherwise is if florida beats them in that game. if we have such a good d (which we do) then we should be agressive. we could have done hail mary's the whole game and put up 17 points.
 

VN Store



Back
Top