orangetitanfan
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 11, 2009
- Messages
- 605
- Likes
- 411
Just from what I know now because of CCM short tenure...
Pearl is a much better promoter
Pearl is a much better recruiter
Pearl brings excitement year round
Martin appears to be a better player developer. Especially developing guards.
Martin's offense seems to get much better open shots.
I think most of Pearl's teams played just as hard as the 3 games I have seen from CCM.
One of the thing that I loved about Pearl is that the team that he may be playing may have much better talent, but he will still come out with the win more times than not.
Lets not get the Pearl Bashing going .. everyone loved Pearl, he brought our program from no one to someone, from a NIT question mark to sweet 16s an elite 8, dominance over memphis and florida, and a #1 ranking with several huge top 5 wins..
all that being said, i think CCM will be fine, but im not saying anything about his coaching style til i see our boys play some legit compitition like were about to get in maui
I agree that pearl's teams got up to play the big games and were very competitive against some of the best teams in the country. But in the same respect pearl had some pretty notable let downs. His teams play seemed to go along with how emotionally involved they were. Not a very business like approach.
Bruce Pearl's winning percentage is INCREDIBLY high. I have nothing against Cuonzo, but to say he is a better coach than Pearl at this point in his young coaching career is ludicrous. They are very different coaches and it's way too hard to see if Cuonzo compares to Pearl right now.
I think we are 2 recruits, 1 shooter and one big man, from competing for an SEC Championship.