madtownvol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 18, 2014
- Messages
- 6,245
- Likes
- 25,488
If you compare this current LV team to Holly's teams, and even last year's team, it is quite striking how different the offensive game has become. Under Holly, the LVs wanted to push pace, run and gun, and use their generally superior athleticism against opponents. The key to beating the LVs was slowing the game down and forcing them into more methodical half court sets. Under Holly (and her ultimate undoing), the LVs steadily become less and less proficient in running half court sets and less effective in transition.
Under Kellie, it is almost the exact opposite. The team is much more methodical and deliberate on offense and using a lot more the shot clock. Kellie wants to use size, rather than speed, to score points. And the LVs points in the paint are definitely up. Against Bama, I saw a nice improvement in that the LVs were still deliberate in running their offensuve sets but they were moving ball quicker, with less dribbling from the PG, which made the defense chase more and created lanes or open shots.
I am not crazy about the frequent pairing of Tamari and KK but it seems consistent with a goal of dominating through size and controlling the boards.
The potential problem with this approach is that a team has to hit some threes for it to be sustainable or else teams will crowd the paint and make it really difficult to execute high low type plays. Against Bama, when they were making a little run, for example, the LVs hit several threes in close sucession (from Davis, Burrell, and I think Walker) that broke the run. So suffcient outside shooting (along with keeping TOs down) are keys to success for this offensive style to keep working
Per the Georgia meltdown, the GA coach made a nice adjustment by going with a smaller line-up and as they say, speeding the game up against the LVs, who, in turn, lost their composure (and the game).
During the run, Kellie tried to stay big, with a long stretch pairing Key and KK, and that did not go well.
I would love to see Coach Harper use a small ball line-up in stretches (which would not be that small actually) to combat the type of adjustments that GA made, using for example, Rae, Rennia, Destiny, Jordan H and Jordan W.
Under Kellie, it is almost the exact opposite. The team is much more methodical and deliberate on offense and using a lot more the shot clock. Kellie wants to use size, rather than speed, to score points. And the LVs points in the paint are definitely up. Against Bama, I saw a nice improvement in that the LVs were still deliberate in running their offensuve sets but they were moving ball quicker, with less dribbling from the PG, which made the defense chase more and created lanes or open shots.
I am not crazy about the frequent pairing of Tamari and KK but it seems consistent with a goal of dominating through size and controlling the boards.
The potential problem with this approach is that a team has to hit some threes for it to be sustainable or else teams will crowd the paint and make it really difficult to execute high low type plays. Against Bama, when they were making a little run, for example, the LVs hit several threes in close sucession (from Davis, Burrell, and I think Walker) that broke the run. So suffcient outside shooting (along with keeping TOs down) are keys to success for this offensive style to keep working
Per the Georgia meltdown, the GA coach made a nice adjustment by going with a smaller line-up and as they say, speeding the game up against the LVs, who, in turn, lost their composure (and the game).
During the run, Kellie tried to stay big, with a long stretch pairing Key and KK, and that did not go well.
I would love to see Coach Harper use a small ball line-up in stretches (which would not be that small actually) to combat the type of adjustments that GA made, using for example, Rae, Rennia, Destiny, Jordan H and Jordan W.