Kurt Warner of Rams or Kurt Warner of Cards?

[Showtime]

Who would you rather have on your team?
Obviously this guy is the all-around leader of the Cardinals. I don't think there's any question - I'd take a younger Warner any day.

 

[orangeblooded2]

I have a feeling the young or the old,the results will be the same in two weeks.

 

[utvolpj]

I would have liked to see a young KW throwing to Fitzgerald & Boldin

 

[dickens821]

I would have liked to see a young KW throwing to Fitzgerald & Boldin

It would have been obscenely awesome.
Posted via VolNation Mobile

 

[orangeblooded2]

I would have liked to see a young KW throwing to Fitzgerald & Boldin

I got to see him in the arena league before he exploded into the NFL.

 

[milohimself]

I would have liked to see a young KW throwing to Fitzgerald & Boldin

He would have the single season passing record.

 

[BigPapaVol]

He would have the single season passing record.

It not like his crew of Bruce, Holt and Faulk weren't as good as anyone assembled.
Posted via VolNation Mobile

 

[tidwell]

It not like his crew of Bruce, Holt and Faulk weren't as good as anyone assembled.
Posted via VolNation Mobile

Exactly.

In fact, with Faulk in his prime at the time, I'd say that St. Louis offense was better than this Arizona unit.

 

[BigPapaVol]

Exactly.

In fact, with Faulk in his prime at the time, I'd say that St. Louis offense was better than this Arizona unit.

Not any doubt about it. Faulk was an extra pro bowl style slot receiver coming from the backfield. He was just better with it after he caught it.
Posted via VolNation Mobile

 

[All Vol 14]

Rams no doubt.

 

[buckeyevol23]

Yeah Boldin and Fitzgerald may be better than Holt and Bruce were but I'd take those two with Faulk over the Cardinals WRs and stable of backs.

And I'd go with the younger Warner too.

 

[doozer]

It not like his crew of Bruce, Holt and Faulk weren't as good as anyone assembled.
Posted via VolNation Mobile

Exactly.

In fact, with Faulk in his prime at the time, I'd say that St. Louis offense was better than this Arizona unit.

Not any doubt about it. Faulk was an extra pro bowl style slot receiver coming from the backfield. He was just better with it after he caught it.
Posted via VolNation Mobile

these are the correct answers.

 

[thagodfather]

I have a feeling the young or the old,the results will be the same in two weeks.

yea, the steelers defense would own either one.

 

[TrueOrange]

I have a feeling the young or the old,the results will be the same in two weeks.

That statement could go either way. He both won and lost a Super Bowl as a Rams QB

 

[kptvol]

Not any doubt about it. Faulk was an extra pro bowl style slot receiver coming from the backfield. He was just better with it after he caught it.
Posted via VolNation Mobile

Edge is a pretty good receiver, though. Not on the level of Faulk, but then I'm not really sure there's ever been a better receiving threat at RB than MF.