Lady Vols nationally ranked at or near top in several key stats

#1

kamoshika

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2008
Messages
4,233
Likes
19,748
#1
Out of 349 DI teams, UT is currently...
  • 1st in rebound margin (15.5)...9th at this point last year (11.6)
  • 1st in defensive rebounds per game (33.3)...unavailable
  • 2nd in rebounds per game (49.5)...7th (46.0)
  • 2nd in FG % defense (.307)...179th (.396)
  • 2nd in blocked shots per game (7.1)...119th (3.6)
  • 11th in assists per game (18.2)...100th (4.5)
  • 12th in scoring margin (21.0)...48th (11.9)
  • 14th in scoring defense (54.4)...228th (66.5)
  • 17th in FG % (.459)...74th (.429)
  • 19th in 3pt FG % defense (.258)...216th (.318)
Still, we have significant room for improvement in some areas...
  • 198th in turnovers per game (16.6)...208th (16.8)
  • 237th in FT % (.663)...226th (.666)
  • 286th in turnover margin (-2.7)...106th (1.9)
  • 297th in steals per game (6.2)...70th (9.7)
* Edited to add where we stood nationally as of 1/17/19

Source: NCAA® Ranking Summary
 
Last edited:
#2
#2
Out of 349 DI teams, UT is currently...
  • 1st in rebound margin (15.5)
  • 1st in defensive rebounds per game (33.3)
  • 2nd in rebounds per game (49.5)
  • 2nd in FG percentage defense (30.7%)
  • 2nd in blocked shots per game (7.1)
  • 11th in assists per game (18.2)
  • 12th in scoring margin (21.0)
  • 14th in scoring defense (54.4)
  • 19th in 3pt FG percentage defense (25.8%)
Still, we have significant room for improvement in some areas...
  • 198th in turnovers per game (16.6)
  • 237th in FT percentage (66.3%)
  • 286th in turnover margin (-2.7)
  • 297th in steals per game (6.2)
Source: NCAA® Ranking Summary

Pretty exciting, and the Lady Vols shot 90% free throws last night. 😀
 
#5
#5
And top 5 in number of bad teams we have played. Statistics are great and all but bottom line the stat that should matter is 0-3 vs good teams. Don’t get me wrong I know we are better but seems like other teams have regressed on our schedule.
Georgia was a quality win if you're looking at RPI, and there'll be plenty more to weigh in on over the next month. We're currently 1-3 against the RPI top 100, but every one of the next 10 are against teams currently in the RPI top 100. I don't think we'll win all of them but I really don't think we'll lose all of them either. The current RPI projection has us wrapping up at 10-6 in conference, which would be a 3-game improvement over last year. We obviously have some things that could be tightened up, but we've clearly improved significantly.
 
#6
#6
And top 5 in number of bad teams we have played. Statistics are great and all but bottom line the stat that should matter is 0-3 vs good teams. Don’t get me wrong I know we are better but seems like other teams have regressed on our schedule.
Waahhh
 
#8
#8
We've been unfortunate that all but one of the games versus better teams have been on the road. The difference between winning on the road versus a top team versus playing them at home is quite huge. The loss to Texas was totally because of one of our poorest offensive games of the season. We had the open shots very few were made. We held Texas to 36 percent from the field but we shot 30. The game at Stanford was another miserable offensive performance 27 percent. Their defense had a lot to do with that but no reason we should ever shoot under 40. The Kentucky game was our poorest defensive game of the season plus they hit some very well guarded threes and some we didn't even try to guard. Our next game against a top rated team is also on the road. We also have to play South Carolina on the road. The key games for us are Miss St at home and Texas A&M at home we need to perform well in both and take away wins. My personal belief if we played Kentucky at home right now we'd win and same if we played Texas again. Not the same team now as was when we played Texas the first time. Doubt Kentucky could match the offensive effort they had again if we played ten times. Stanford has more talent than we do but would love to see what we could do against them at home. So I'm saying at home I think could play with anybody in the nation would definitely win some and lose some. We were not really ready for those road test much more capable now, but when teams have more talent and are at home that is a difficult game to win anytime during the season.
 
  • Like
Reactions: volnationnj
#9
#9
I would love to know where Tennessee ranked in all these categories at this point last season.

I swear, if there is ANYone left in this world who STILL refuses to admit that this team and program has made noticeable improvement, then I honestly think they need to see a neurologist. Something is not right in that person’s head.
 
#10
#10
I would love to know where Tennessee ranked in all these categories at this point last season.

I swear, if there is ANYone left in this world who STILL refuses to admit that this team and program has made noticeable improvement, then I honestly think they need to see a neurologist. Something is not right in that person’s head.

First team I can remember since Holly became coach that had more assists than turnovers and our block total has already surpassed last season here at mid-season.
 
  • Like
Reactions: creekdipper
#11
#11
And top 5 in number of bad teams we have played. Statistics are great and all but bottom line the stat that should matter is 0-3 vs good teams. Don’t get me wrong I know we are better but seems like other teams have regressed on our schedule.
You can only play who you are scheduled.
 
#12
#12
And top 5 in number of bad teams we have played. Statistics are great and all but bottom line the stat that should matter is 0-3 vs good teams. Don’t get me wrong I know we are better but seems like other teams have regressed on our schedule.

You say that, but against very similar completion last season our stats were nowhere near as good.

Statistics do tell you a lot about how consistent a team is and ours have become pretty dang consistent the last 7 or 8 games.
 
#13
#13
And top 5 in number of bad teams we have played. Statistics are great and all but bottom line the stat that should matter is 0-3 vs good teams. Don’t get me wrong I know we are better but seems like other teams have regressed on our schedule.
A victory over UConn will rectify this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RollerVol and PG1
#14
#14
Truth is, no matter how good some of the many opponents who've traveled to Storrs/Hartford to challenge Connecticut in the past 10-15 years have been, there have only been a handful of teams that have managed to come out of there with a win. They are typically very, VERY strong on their home court. IMO, it will take a near miracle for the still-learning Tennessee to do something that many, many far more talented and experienced teams have failed to do over the years.

In a story following yet another drubbing of South Carolina by Connecticut, Dawn Staley talked about the preferential treatment they get on their home floor:

Is UConn vs. South Carolina Even a Rivalry?

Excerpt:

No coach is fond of losing, especially not to UConn, but Staley seemed to imply UConn gets preferential treatment, on their home floor and elsewhere.

“You’re not coming back from a big lead being in this building and the elements that surround the game,” she said, emphasis added.

“You gotta put them back on their heels and expect not to get many calls, fouls called, you just have to play through physical contact, you have to play through attacking the paint.”
 
#15
#15
We've been unfortunate that all but one of the games versus better teams have been on the road. The difference between winning on the road versus a top team versus playing them at home is quite huge. The loss to Texas was totally because of one of our poorest offensive games of the season. We had the open shots very few were made. We held Texas to 36 percent from the field but we shot 30. The game at Stanford was another miserable offensive performance 27 percent. Their defense had a lot to do with that but no reason we should ever shoot under 40. The Kentucky game was our poorest defensive game of the season plus they hit some very well guarded threes and some we didn't even try to guard. Our next game against a top rated team is also on the road. We also have to play South Carolina on the road. The key games for us are Miss St at home and Texas A&M at home we need to perform well in both and take away wins. My personal belief if we played Kentucky at home right now we'd win and same if we played Texas again. Not the same team now as was when we played Texas the first time. Doubt Kentucky could match the offensive effort they had again if we played ten times. Stanford has more talent than we do but would love to see what we could do against them at home. So I'm saying at home I think could play with anybody in the nation would definitely win some and lose some. We were not really ready for those road test much more capable now, but when teams have more talent and are at home that is a difficult game to win anytime during the season.
We may not be at home for any games in the NCAA Tourney either so should we just decline an invite?
 
#16
#16
First it's good to see so many positive posts on the entire forum. It is quite a welcome change for someone like me who just cruises through.
Second, I am a whole lot more worried about beating you guys on the 23rd. We have really sucked the last 3 games. It's like Baylor hurt our psyche in just 4 minutes.

I still think we have enough for an easy win if we get our heads right by then.
 
#18
#18
Thanks to the magic of DVR and some marginal weather that ruled out outdoor chores, I was able to watch a lot of wcbb this week. A lot. And here are a few conclusions that I've reached, that others may or may not agree with.

-- Any team that wants to beat South Carolina this season will have to defend, rebound, and shoot well. One or two of the three won't get it done. On a good night the Lady Vols can rebound and shoot, but I'm not sure their improving defense is up to the task yet.

-- Tenn has the talent and ability to upset UConn. They match up pretty well at every position except PG. There'll be no blowouts here unless the Huskies and their home crowd get into the LV's psyche. UConn looked dreadful against two teams -- Memphis and UCF -- that Tenn could handle. UConn is NOT a good road team. If this game was in Knoxfville I'd give the LV's a 50-50 chance. But, alas, it's not. But it's still far from a hopeless task, especially if they can protect the 3-pt line..

-- Without Ionescu Oregon would be only the fourth or fifth best team in the Pac 12. If she stays 100% all year, they're good. If not, they're in trouble.

-- When the Stanford freshman play like upper classmen they're very good. But when they don't....

-- Pac 12 is like the Conference that cried "wolf!" Every year the folks out west tell us this is the year you'll see that it's not Stanford, Oregon and 10 wannabes, and then there's some disappointment by the end of the season. Not this year. There are six legit contenders. They're going to beat each other up, but they'll be tough outs in the big tourney.

--Matthew Mitchell showed some class when he admitted that beating a Texas A&M team without Carter was not as big an achievement as it will look in the SEC standings. But he said he was still glad they got the win. Once again, injuries will cause some skewing of the SEC records and SEC Tourney seedings. But that's just a fact of life in a conference with a lot of competitive teams.

-- Robin Pingeton at Missouri is one of the best coaches in the SEC. Her defensive schemes and game plans are solid, and she gets her players to follow them, but her players haven't got the athletic skills to execute them consistently for anywhere close to four quarters. Yet despite their poor record, her players seem to be playing hard (spare me the "play dirty" comments) and enjoying themselves, and most get playing time (often as many as 9 players get 10 minutes or more) although part of that is because of their consistent foul trouble, a result of less athletic players trying to play tight defense on SEC stars. You can't build a program overnight in the SEC, she has a couple of good freshman, but the transfers haven't panned out as well yet as hoped. Folks note that they lost Cunningham, but they also lost their best forward and two best point guards from last year. Robin needs another good recruiting year and that might be very tough to get. (Okay, I'm prejudiced, I'm a Mizzou grad.)
 
#19
#19
Thanks to the magic of DVR and some marginal weather that ruled out outdoor chores, I was able to watch a lot of wcbb this week. A lot. And here are a few conclusions that I've reached, that others may or may not agree with.

-- Any team that wants to beat South Carolina this season will have to defend, rebound, and shoot well. One or two of the three won't get it done. On a good night the Lady Vols can rebound and shoot, but I'm not sure their improving defense is up to the task yet.

-- Tenn has the talent and ability to upset UConn. They match up pretty well at every position except PG. There'll be no blowouts here unless the Huskies and their home crowd get into the LV's psyche. UConn looked dreadful against two teams -- Memphis and UCF -- that Tenn could handle. UConn is NOT a good road team. If this game was in Knoxfville I'd give the LV's a 50-50 chance. But, alas, it's not. But it's still far from a hopeless task, especially if they can protect the 3-pt line..

-- Without Ionescu Oregon would be only the fourth or fifth best team in the Pac 12. If she stays 100% all year, they're good. If not, they're in trouble.

-- When the Stanford freshman play like upper classmen they're very good. But when they don't....

-- Pac 12 is like the Conference that cried "wolf!" Every year the folks out west tell us this is the year you'll see that it's not Stanford, Oregon and 10 wannabes, and then there's some disappointment by the end of the season. Not this year. There are six legit contenders. They're going to beat each other up, but they'll be tough outs in the big tourney.

--Matthew Mitchell showed some class when he admitted that beating a Texas A&M team without Carter was not as big an achievement as it will look in the SEC standings. But he said he was still glad they got the win. Once again, injuries will cause some skewing of the SEC records and SEC Tourney seedings. But that's just a fact of life in a conference with a lot of competitive teams.

-- Robin Pingeton at Missouri is one of the best coaches in the SEC. Her defensive schemes and game plans are solid, and she gets her players to follow them, but her players haven't got the athletic skills to execute them consistently for anywhere close to four quarters. Yet despite their poor record, her players seem to be playing hard (spare me the "play dirty" comments) and enjoying themselves, and most get playing time (often as many as 9 players get 10 minutes or more) although part of that is because of their consistent foul trouble, a result of less athletic players trying to play tight defense on SEC stars. You can't build a program overnight in the SEC, she has a couple of good freshman, but the transfers haven't panned out as well yet as hoped. Folks note that they lost Cunningham, but they also lost their best forward and two best point guards from last year. Robin needs another good recruiting year and that might be very tough to get. (Okay, I'm prejudiced, I'm a Mizzou grad.)
Excellent assessments, and good reading to boot. Gonna ignore your entire last paragraph and give that post a like :p

How do you all feel about the Big 10 this year (say, compared to last year)?
 
#21
#21
Yeah, I guess our players are sick and tired of getting on the line for suicides, so that free throw percentage has made a pretty dramatic improvement. lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolBall09

VN Store



Back
Top