I would have rather played Memphis high to see how good they are.
I didn't see Memphis play this year--but that is a consistently strong, well-coached program. They had an impressive 18-1 record, conference champ, 14 RPI. Some fans think they got hosed only getting a 6 seed, while a couple of others argue that their schedule, overall, was weak.
The RPI/data experts, Henderson and another guy on a site I follow, say South Alabama not getting in as RPI 27 was the only time a team with an under 30 RPI has not made the tournament. IN other words, they think South Alabama got hosed.
ACC fans feeling aggrieved because 4 of their 5 NCAA teams are on the same side of the bracket. An unusual down year for the ACC. I believe Virginia has not only been in the NCAA tourney for....I don't know how many straight years---a lot. I think until last year, maybe, they'd been to the NCAA quarterfinals something like 14 straight years, or 14/15 of the last 15/16. Didn't get in this year--definitely a rebuilding year. Duke didn't make it either. ACC fans are wondering how 9 Big10 teams got in. That IS curious as historically the Big10 has not been strong in soccer. Iowa, a low seed, surprisingly won the Big10 tournament--and thus got it. It wouldn't have gotten in otherwise. Michigan was a bubble team that got in.
If we can beat Xavier--and that's a big if--we'd likely play 5 seed Nebraska in the 2nd round. That's about as good a draw as we could hope for in the 2nd round--and probably better than most of the other SEC teams in the tourney. We'd almost certainly play UCLA in the 3rd round--if we were good enough to get that far...and that, friends, is where our tourney would end.
--If South Carolina wins its first-round game, it has to play Stanford next. Tough. (A lot of fans think the committee was very unfair to put UCLA and Stanford, two top 5 schools this year, in the same bracket. I agree--not a good decision and seems unfair to those two schools.
--If bama wins its first-round game, it would likely play UNC in 2nd round. Tough--but UNC, for all its talent, has struggled to score the last couple of years.
--Arkansas, if it wins its first game, would play Pitt in the second round. Pitt is good this year--lost to FSU in the ACC final.
--LSU, if its wins its first-round game, would next play a strong Notre Dame team.
---If Texas A&M wins its first round match, it would play Pensky's formidable, high-scoring FSU.
---Georgia, if it wins its first game, would play Iowa. That's a good draw for Georgia--the dawgs are certainly capable of winning that one.
---Miss. State, if it wins its first game, would play Brown in the 2nd round. That's about as good a draw as one could hope for---though the Ivy League shouldn't be underestimated in soccer.
In Xavier, the Vols do have one of the toughest first-round matches among SEC teams. Xavier was 14-3-4 this year, lost in the finals of their Big East conference tournament to Georgetown, 0-2. They were 6-0-4 in the Big East, which is impressive. The Big East is not as strong as the SEC but got a respectable 3 teams in the NCAA. We are capable of beating Xavier, for sure, and also quite capable of losing. It's how you play on the day, baby. Last year we scored to go ahead of Xavier fairly early in the game and, as I recall, our play gradually deteriorated as the game progressed. Xavier scored at some point to tie--and then the game went into overtime and Xavier scored two goals. L. We cannot give up dumb goals owing to mistakes by the keeper or our centerbacks being caught flat-footed and lackadaiscal and expect to beat anybody--as we saw this season--much less an NCAA opponent.
I wonder if we practiced on the field at all this week, or just did cardio/weights, etc, rested and waited. I also wonder if we might get Hofmann back for this game, but I have no idea since we never know anything about injuries. I'm happy that our players, and in particular our transfer-in players, get to experience the NCAA tourney. That's a good thing.