LaMarcus Coker

#1

allvol123

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2006
Messages
50,179
Likes
50,304
#1
If this guy is healthy, he should get 90% of the carries at tailback. The staff bungled another personnel decision in the offseason. How he was not the starter for the Cal game and why he didn't get 20 carries against UF is mind boggling. Was he hurt to start the year? This coaching staff shows major problems in terms of evaluating their own talent.
 
#2
#2
He wasnt hurt, I remember alot of people saying in here he fumbles alot. Plus Hardesty had a big Cal game or 1 big run against Cal and Foster was the starter.

He did catch a TD against Florida though.
 
#3
#3
If this guy is healthy, he should get 90% of the carries at tailback. The staff bungled another personnel decision in the offseason. How he was not the starter for the Cal game and why he didn't get 20 carries against UF is mind boggling. Was he hurt to start the year? This coaching staff shows major problems in terms of evaluating their own talent.

Did you see how Coker was running? It wasn't his normal gait.
 
#4
#4
Did you see how Coker was running? It wasn't his normal gait.

Last night? Yes I did, even at partial strength he was better than the other 2. That is why I said if he is healthy he sould get 90% of the carries. Also, the coaching stuff screwed up by him not being the primary carrier from the beginning of the season.
 
#5
#5
Last night? Yes I did, even at partial strength he was better than the other 2. That is why I said if he is healthy he sould get 90% of the carries. Also, the coaching stuff screwed up by him not being the primary carrier from the beginning of the season.

Oh yeah, I agree, he's clearly our best back. I just think they were being careful.
 

VN Store



Back
Top