volinbham
VN GURU
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2004
- Messages
- 69,687
- Likes
- 62,054
Perhaps you've seen the news stories about the school (5-9 year olds) that banned Lego's for a while because:
When Legotown was destroyed it gave the teachers an opportunity.
Apparently, all was not well in Legotown...
The teachers set up a new game:
Finally, the little tykes got the message and new Legotown (let's call it Leningrad) emerged based on these feelings from the children.
Why We Banned Legos - Volume 21 No. 2 - Winter 2006 - Rethinking Schools Online
Isn't that special...
We recognized that children are political beings, actively shaping their social and political understandings of ownership and economic equity — whether we interceded or not. We agreed that we want to take part in shaping the children's understandings from a perspective of social justice. So we decided to take the Legos out of the classroom.
When Legotown was destroyed it gave the teachers an opportunity.
We saw the decimation of Lego-town as an opportunity to launch a critical evaluation of Legotown and the inequities of private ownership and hierarchical authority on which it was founded.
Apparently, all was not well in Legotown...
During the boom days of Legotown, we'd suggested to the key Lego players that there was an unequal distribution of power giving rise to conflict and tension. Our suggestions were met with deep resistance. Children denied any explicit or unfair power, making comments like "Some-body's got to be in charge or there would be chaos," and "The little kids ask me because I'm good at Legos." They viewed their power as passive leadership, benignly granted, arising from mastery and long experience with Legos, as well as from their social status in the group.
The teachers set up a new game:
To make sense of the sting of this disenfranchisement, most of the children cast Liam and Kyla as "mean," trying to "make people feel bad." They were unable or unwilling to see that the rules of the game — which mirrored the rules of our capitalist meritocracy — were a setup for winning and losing. Playing by the rules led to a few folks winning big and most folks falling further and further behind.
Finally, the little tykes got the message and new Legotown (let's call it Leningrad) emerged based on these feelings from the children.
A house is good because it is a community house."
"It's important to have the same amount of power as other people over your building. And it's important to have the same priorities."
"We should have equal houses. They should be standard sizes.... We should all just have the same number of pieces, like 15 or 28 pieces."
Why We Banned Legos - Volume 21 No. 2 - Winter 2006 - Rethinking Schools Online
Isn't that special...