(thunder5 @ Jan 25 said:I'll be honest. I kind of wondered if Pearl just got hot at the right time last year and ended up cashing in on it. Of course alot of that had to do with not caring enough about Vols basketball to really look into Pearls past success before passing judgement.
I can't remember if I posted this these thoughts, or if I mentioned them in conversations on the subject. 1. Pearl, Lutz, and Anderson would have all been good choices. 2. I was of the opinion that UT should have gauged the interest of Bob Huggins, Bobby Gonzalez, and Gregg Marshall. 3. Mike Anderson will never coach in the SEC as long as Frank Broyles is the AD at Arkansas.(VolBeef88 @ Jan 25 said:Well I don't remember who it was hat, but I remember some of the usual naysayers saying how this was not a good hire.
(hatvol96 @ Jan 25 said:I can't remember if I posted this these thoughts, or if I mentioned them in conversations on the subject. 1. Pearl, Lutz, and Anderson would have all been good choices. 2. I was of the opinion that UT should have gauged the interest of Bob Huggins, Bobby Gonzalez, and Gregg Marshall. 3. Mike Anderson will never coach in the SEC as long as Frank Broyles is the AD at Arkansas.
(volinbham @ Jan 25 said:I don't remember for sure but I would imagine I was pro Pearl for the following reasons:
1) my choice was Mike Anderson - outstanding performance so far as a head coach. BP style very similar so I was probably in favor of BP since Anderson was out of the picture.
2) BP just got done beating Bama in the NCAAs. Anybody that beats Bama is all-right with me :biggrin2:
(VolBeef88 @ Jan 25 said:Well I appreciate your honesty but you were not even on the board when the "CBP is the wrong hire" threads were being posted.