LONDON SWIMMING POOL

#3
#3
0923757479988f369225fd568fc283c7.gif
 
#4
#4
It would depend on who was going swimming with me. A Victoria Secret Sports Illustrated super model....well yes. Otherwise refer to Vader's post
 
  • Like
Reactions: malinoisvol
#6
#6
I love how the write up veers from the exceptional architectural/engineering feat for which this should be viewed, to devolving into discussing how the lower rent tenants dont have access to it.

This is everything now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sona
#7
#7
I love how the write up veers from the exceptional architectural/engineering feat for which this should be viewed, to devolving into discussing how the lower rent tenants dont have access to it.

This is everything now.

I lived in a condo that had a swimming pool. I never opted to pay the fee for utilizing it. Seemed fair to me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tbh and allvol123
#8
#8
I love how the write up veers from the exceptional architectural/engineering feat for which this should be viewed, to devolving into discussing how the lower rent tenants dont have access to it.

This is everything now.
Cant have the common rabble polluting the water used by the landed gentry.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tbh and allvol123
#10
#10
I love how the write up veers from the exceptional architectural/engineering feat for which this should be viewed, to devolving into discussing how the lower rent tenants dont have access to it.

This is everything now.
989DC732-CD98-49BC-AEFC-F9C8F0193991.png
 
#11
#11
Since I can’t see five feet without my glasses, which I do not swim in, I would have no problem with this pool. A blur is a blur
 

VN Store



Back
Top