HoptownVol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2014
- Messages
- 8,141
- Likes
- 5,651
no debate, i hate saying it brady is way better. even eli is better if you count super bowls. peyton needs to get him a serious defense and a good running game. if he wants a chance to get another one.
SB's should count for a lot in a QB's career, don't get me wrong, but I don't think you should compare the players solely based off of them. For example, I don't believe Russel Wilson losing the Super Bowl for the Seahawks should make Brady any better of a QB.[/QUOTE]
Now thats funny right there. lol:
SB's should count for a lot in a QB's career, don't get me wrong, but I don't think you should compare the players solely based off of them. For example, I don't believe Russel Wilson losing the Super Bowl for the Seahawks should make Brady any better of a QB.[/QUOTE]
Now thats funny right there. lol:
Alright
Russell Wilson is about 45,000 yards behind Brady for his career. When he has accomplished the things Brady
has, then you can open the debate. Sorry.
I was saying Super Bowls aren't the only thing you should look at when comparing QB's, because the Seahawks lost that game more than Brady won it for the Patriots.
Brady quarterbacked a team who's leading rusher had 412 yards for the season and who's main WR's are Julien Edelman, Brandon LaFell, and Danny Amendola to a championship.
We had this debate on the NFL forum. I would argue that the Patriot roster is the worst roster to ever win a Super Bowl. No joke. In fairness, I don't know about the Jets roster that won Super Bowl III or the Colt roster that won Super Bowl V. But, I would make the argument or worst team to ever win the Super Bowl.
Rob Ninkovich led that team in sacks.
I was hoping to watch Eli beat Brady in SB- Only Manning that ever did beat him. Sorry. Bad post. It's almost comical at this point.
And carving up defenses with inferior talent....dont forget that one.
I was saying Super Bowls aren't the only thing you should look at when comparing QB's, because the Seahawks lost that game more than Brady won it for the Patriots.
Wrong. Brady won it. In the 4th quarter the Pats were down by 10 and could have folded. But what did Brady do against the #1 defense in the league? Led the offense on 2 60+ yard drives and scored on both of them. Without Brady, the Pats would have been lucky to score at all. The only reason the Seahawks were even in a position to win was a miracle catch a la Tyree/Manningham.
Another uninformed comment. Brady beat Manning his first 6 tries through the 2005 playoffs but since then which is the past 10 years they are 5-5 head to head with Manning WINNING both playoff games (the games Manning supposedly always chokes). Those first few Manning years his teams and defenses were an absolute joke, and there is not a better Coach than Belichick. That being said Brady has had a better career than Manning because of the 4 Super Bowls but not as much as people love to gloat about. A lot of stock into Super Bowl wins is what puts him over the edge but if everyone wants to just use that as a measuring stick lets just say Terry Bradshaw was the best QB ever....which is asinine.