Vercingetorix
Fluidmaster
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2006
- Messages
- 31,177
- Likes
- 2,728
McGwire will be a very successful hitting coach.
If I thought that hitting coaches matter at all, I'd predict that McGwire would be a flop. How does a physical giant who was at one extreme end of the bell curve as a hitter teach the other 99 percent of the guys anything useful? What does McGwire know that would be useful at all to, say, a slap-hitting shortstop? That link I posted, while funny, has it exactly right -- all McGwire did was look for one pitch and yank it down the line with more power than any hitter who probably ever lived. That doesn't seem like a skill which he's going to be able to teach anybody else. It's like hiring Shaquille O'Neal to run a fundamentals basketball camp for middle schoolers.
But since hitting coaches are almost meaningless, he'll be fine.
didn't he have a huge hole in his swing? I don't see how this makes any sense...be like bringing bonds back in that role.
McGwire is steriods, he'll come out one day like Pete Rose and his gambling deal and say he's sorry. Its just so obvious the guy was on it.
Many successful coaches have never excelled at what they teach. It's common knowledge that your ability to coach the game has nothing to do with your ability to play the game.
The attached article speaks of some of the most successful hitting coaches in MLB (Rudy Jamarillo and Charlie Lau), and how they never had much success at the plate.
All else aside, is McGwire qualified to be hitting coach? | Round Two | STLtoday
I think it would be a lot easier to be a coach who never excelled at all in what you're trying to teach than to have been someone who was enormously successful by having an off-the-charts, basically unteachable skill. Gretzky was the smartest hockey player I've ever seen, but he was a crappy coach. Magic Johnson was a crummy basketball coach. Ted Williams was a crummy manager because he was so impatient with how relatively awful ordinary players were. Very, very few stars retire and then turn around to be successful coaches in their sport.
I mean, if you're Tony Gwynn, how do teach people to do what you did? "What's so hard about it? Just see the ball and serve it into right field. No problem."
I think it would be a lot easier to be a coach who never excelled at all in what you're trying to teach than to have been someone who was enormously successful by having an off-the-charts, basically unteachable skill. Gretzky was the smartest hockey player I've ever seen, but he was a crappy coach. Magic Johnson was a crummy basketball coach. Ted Williams was a crummy manager because he was so impatient with how relatively awful ordinary players were. Very, very few stars retire and then turn around to be successful coaches in their sport.
I mean, if you're Tony Gwynn, how do teach people to do what you did? "What's so hard about it? Just see the ball and serve it into right field. No problem."