KingtUT
I reign supreme!
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2010
- Messages
- 5,815
- Likes
- 3,720
Lane averages 5.8 per carry. Neal 5.0.
Is that the stat you're referring to?
I guess I would find out just how many he could handle.
Last time I checked, he was in the doghouse not the hospital.
I guess all of the coaches are blinded at how much better Lane is than Neal, in every aspect ofwhat it takes to be a starting a running back. Funny how everyone was praising Neal who had to carry the load against SCjr just a short time ago...
Neal has his qualities too, which is why he should still get some carries. Just not the majority.
He's needs to be getting the majority of the carries. Check the stats. He finds the hole better than Neal does and doesn't go down as easy. Not knocking Neal , just saying Lane should be getting more touches
You can't just look at average yards per rush and say that justifies your argument (see my last post). I like Lane and am glad he will be starting next year but wow this team is full of better backup players than starters.