Massive oil field in Gulf, boosts U.S. supplies by 50%. Deepest Oil Well in Gulf

#1

WA_Vol

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 9, 2005
Messages
18,663
Likes
12
#1
I posted this in another thread, but it didn't get much attention. I thought this was fantastic news. It is the deepest oil well in the Gulf, and is Abiogenic oil.


Chevron and two oil exploration companies annnounced the discovery of a giant oil reserve in the Gulf of Mexico that could boost the nation's supplies by as much as 50 percent and provide compelling evidence oil is a plentiful deep-earth product made naturally on a continuous basis.

Known as the Jack Field, the reserve – some 270 miles southwest of New Orleans – is estimated to hold as much as 15 billion barrels of oil. The Wall Street Journal reports today the find could boost the nation's current reserves of 29.3 billion barrels by as much as 50 percent.

Chevron discovered the field by drilling the deepest to date in the Gulf of Mexico, down 28,175 feet in waters nearly 7,000 feet deep, some seven miles below the surface of the Earth.

The second biggest source of oil in the world is Mexico's giant Cantarell field in the Gulf of Mexico near the Yucatan Peninsula. It was discovered in 1976, supposedly after a fisherman named Cantarell reported an oil seep in Campeche Bay.
In March, Mexico announced the discovery of a field that could be larger than Cantarell, the Noxal field in the Gulf of Mexico off Veracruz.

Instead, the abiotic theory argued "oil should be seen as a primordial material that the earth forms and exudes on a continual basis." In an interview with WND, Smith posed the following question: "If U.S. proven reserves can be increased by 50 percent with one deep-earth oil find in the Gulf of Mexico, who knows how much oil might be found as the technology of deep-water drilling advances and becomes even more economically feasible?"

Massive oil field<br> found under Gulf
 
Last edited:
#3
#3
Hurry, we need to put some restrictions on access to this oil! Something like this could produce massive layoffs in the Green industry that Obama is going to use to "create" jobs.
 
#4
#4
Hurry, we need to put some restrictions on access to this oil! Something like this could produce massive layoffs in the Green industry that Obama is going to use to "create" jobs.

All right....More capital gains to tax for the green initiative....
 
#8
#8
Government interference into private enterprise rarely has real promise.

One kind of interference is companies using billions
in grant money every year.That to could be considered
government interference.
I,m sure every year they ask,they say this proposal has real promise.....
 
#10
#10
One kind of interference is companies using billions
in grant money every year.That to could be considered
government interference.
I,m sure every year they ask,they say this proposal has real promise.....
I guess I didn't make myself clear enough. I apologize.
Every act of government intervention limits the area of individual freedom directly and threatens the preservation of freedom indirectly.

Milton Friedman
 
#11
#11
I guess I didn't make myself clear enough. I apologize.

I guess i should warn you,if i turn out to be particularly clear,you've probably misunderstood what I've said.
Alan Greenspan..

I actually agree with Friedman,however I don,t think it applies to the government trying to create jobs in a sector and with sciences that could be deemed to be in the best interest of our country and that has clearly defined national security implications.
 
#12
#12
I guess i should warn you,if i turn out to be particularly clear,you've probably misunderstood what I've said.
Alan Greenspan..

I actually agree with Friedman,however I don,t think it applies to the government trying to create jobs in a sector and with sciences that could be deemed to be in the best interest of our country and that has clearly defined national security implications.
You have obviously not read much of Friedman, else you would fully understand that what he said he intended to imply in just this kind of case.
 
#13
#13
You have obviously not read much of Friedman, else you would fully understand that what he said he intended to imply in just this kind of case.

Create the jobs.Create a clear national agenda on energy.Once these entities are up and running a whole new industry will have been created.

I understand there is already lots of capitol lined up for these enterprises.However big oil and special interest
in Washington are hindering,literally blocking the thing
that you are asserting should be the norm......

If competition and free enterprise are truly, arguably
the best thing for everyone and this country. then lets
create competition for big oil.Secure national interest
in energy and stop the bleeding of the largest transfer of capitol and wealth in the history of the world......
 
#14
#14
If competition and free enterprise are truly, arguably
the best thing for everyone and this country. then lets
create competition for big oil.Secure national interest
in energy and stop the bleeding of the largest transfer of capitol and wealth in the history of the world......

Who are you talking about? If it's the government in some form or fashion then you aren't talking free enterprise.
 
#15
#15
If competition and free enterprise are truly, arguably
the best thing for everyone and this country. then lets
create competition for big oil.Secure national interest
in energy and stop the bleeding of the largest transfer of capitol and wealth in the history of the world......
Did you read and think through this statement prior to posting it???
 
#17
#17
volinbham,theralut,big papavol.

I read your post with interest.I value your opinions.
That being said.I still don't see how it makes a difference
in so much as on this one issue the end result would be the same.Only quicker.

Instead of the back and forth on point, counter point
explain your positions within the confines of my statements.Not economic theory but you personal opinions.

if it intrigues you....or if you have the time to do so...
 
#18
#18
Simply put:

1. It is not capitalism or free enterprise if the government picks a market area for investment to create competition.

2. The government is a poor chooser of winners/losers for technologies/products/industries relative to the market.

3. Even more succinctly, "build it and they will come" is a poor strategy.
 
#19
#19
Someone on here said that they absolutely refute abiogenic oil... I still find it compelling.
 
#20
#20
Someone on here said that they absolutely refute abiogenic oil... I still find it compelling.

Don't know enough about it but I'm open minded about the possibility. The "old dinosaurs" view always seemed a bit like a leap of faith to me.
 

VN Store



Back
Top