No offense taken, now no offense given. Look in your own backyard, if your Cats were St. Xavier in bball, you think that the pressure on RB would be more or less?(Brian McCat @ Dec 24 said:If you haven't noticed, we hired the anti-Mumme, and got a real-to-life, dead mummy in Brooks. Tubby isn't exactly Captain Outrageous, either. There's no one more boring than RB, but that said, there's nothing I would rather see than a win against the Vols. It's nothing personal. To be a Kentucky fan means to have a deep desire to beat Tennessee. And somehow, Fulmer just has our number.
But back to the topic. There's no way that Phil is threatened by any success that Pearl can put together. It's like comparing apples and, ahem... oranges. :birgits_giggle:
(U-T @ Dec 25 said:I was going to say the people on the Internet....they seem to be the most vocal cry-babies of them all
(allvol @ Jan 23 said:I really came to the board today to read about the Vols basketball fortunes. Instead, I see all these anti-Tennessee crap threads related to football.
(CSpindizzy @ Jan 23 said:I thought Zook was the only coach who knew how to party Greek style.
(Brian McCat @ Dec 24 said:If you haven't noticed, we hired the anti-Mumme, and got a real-to-life, dead mummy in Brooks. Tubby isn't exactly Captain Outrageous, either. There's no one more boring than RB, but that said, there's nothing I would rather see than a win against the Vols. It's nothing personal. To be a Kentucky fan means to have a deep desire to beat Tennessee. And somehow, Fulmer just has our number.
But back to the topic. There's no way that Phil is threatened by any success that Pearl can put together. It's like comparing apples and, ahem... oranges. :birgits_giggle:
(JasonCajun' :crazy: date='Jan 23 said:There is anti-Tennessee, meaning fans who do not want UT to do well, and there are those who think that Fulmer is not getting it done here and want UT to win championships again. You need to learn the difference.
(golf437 @ Jan 23 said:It will take a couple of years to rate Pearl as a coach. No doubt he is much better than Buzz. He seems to be a great motivator that can get players to play above their ability.
I have noticed on this board if you do not hate Fulmer and state something positive about him you get attacked. It reminds me of politics. See it my way or we will heap abuse on you.
(volinbham @ Jan 23 said:Agree 100%. The political analogy is a good one - as positions become more extreme, you are tempted to take one-side so fully to counter the claims of the other that even your own arguments become an extreme version of your position. I would imagine that most here are either slightly pro-Fulmer or slightly anti-Fulmer. It is doubtful that any think his last few years have been his best; but differences seem to revolve around the implications and possible solutions.
this is probably very accurate...i know i have probably taken my Pro Fulmer stance simply because there were so many on the complete opposite side of the spectrum (and it didn't hurt that some of them were just downright hateful to our coach and some our fans who support the guy). when the truth is i think Fulmer has a lot of work to do, and is primarily to blame for last season's debacle....poor off season decision with the qbs and wrs, discipline, and i think we're all tired of the same old stuff that we see out of CPF...the clapping on the sidelines after every play good or bad, the "work like heck" quotes after a loss etc....but at the same time, as much as i can get frustrated with him and same old same old, i still think he's earned the right to fix a problem he's created. and the reason that's justified in my mind, is what he's done for this program in the past. As bad as i think this team might have been the past few years on offense, he had a previous 8-9 years that were pretty good...so let's see if he can fix it.(volinbham @ Jan 23 said:Agree 100%. The political analogy is a good one - as positions become more extreme, you are tempted to take one-side so fully to counter the claims of the other that even your own arguments become an extreme version of your position. I would imagine that most here are either slightly pro-Fulmer or slightly anti-Fulmer. It is doubtful that any think his last few years have been his best; but differences seem to revolve around the implications and possible solutions.
(jakez4ut @ Jan 23 said:this is probably very accurate...i know i have probably taken my Pro Fulmer stance simply because there were so many on the complete opposite side of the spectrum
(jakez4ut @ Jan 23 said:comparing the two are silly, i agree with that...it's real easy to jump on the bball bandwagon right now. he's saying all the right things, doing all the right things, and
(jakez4ut @ Jan 23 said:no, what we have here is a failure to communicate... :devilsmoke: