Rasputin_Vol
"Slava Ukraina"
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2007
- Messages
- 72,056
- Likes
- 39,842
That would require forward thinking policy makers. Ours are too caught up in culture wars to worry about helping out America or Americans.Close the borders, legalize drugs and watch their black market drug fueled economy crumble............ But that will never happen because too many letter agencies have fingers in the pie.
I am not following that thread. I am at a loss to understand why there needs to be regime change just because Mexico has made a decision Mexico has every right to make. Even if that decision is not in Uncle Sam's best interests.Lol. Ras trying to shore up his failed deflection and arguments in the Ukraine thread.
You aren't that complicated dude.
Ras is being sarcastic. Since Mexico is making nationalist decisions on their natural resources the CIA needs to move in and install a puppet. Is further guess it’s a dig on the Venezuela situation.I am not following that thread. I am at a loss to understand why there needs to be regime change just because Mexico has made a decision Mexico has every right to make. Even if that decision is not in Uncle Sam's best interests.
He’s really just trying to convince us the US is collapsing, and the solution is to let Russia and China get away with whatever they want.Ras is being sarcastic. Since Mexico is making nationalist decisions on their natural resources the CIA needs to move in and install a puppet. Is further guess it’s a dig on the Venezuela situation.
I am not following that thread. I am at a loss to understand why there needs to be regime change just because Mexico has made a decision Mexico has every right to make. Even if that decision is not in Uncle Sam's best interests.
Decisions like this will force the US to bring "freedom and democracy" to Mexico.I am not following that thread. I am at a loss to understand why there needs to be regime change just because Mexico has made a decision Mexico has every right to make. Even if that decision is not in Uncle Sam's best interests.
The US and Canada have strongly opposed AMLO’s actions, and have threatened a trade war if Mexico continues to roll back access for international corporations in Mexico’s power and oil markets.
Look, two things that aren’t the same being used to “prove” your point.Decisions like this will force the US to bring "freedom and democracy" to Mexico.
The Mexican government continues nationalizing key industries despite US objections
Mexico can't be taking pieces off of the chessboard and denying these western corporatists from controlling their energy sector.
Mexico can and they will if they want.Decisions like this will force the US to bring "freedom and democracy" to Mexico.
The Mexican government continues nationalizing key industries despite US objections
Mexico can't be taking pieces off of the chessboard and denying these western corporatists from controlling their energy sector.
They are doing more than that. They are nationalizing/confiscating land and property owned by US corporations.Decisions like this will force the US to bring "freedom and democracy" to Mexico.
The Mexican government continues nationalizing key industries despite US objections
Mexico can't be taking pieces off of the chessboard and denying these western corporatists from controlling their energy sector.
you mean you are ok with governments seizing private assets now? How Big Brother of you Ras.Decisions like this will force the US to bring "freedom and democracy" to Mexico.
The Mexican government continues nationalizing key industries despite US objections
Mexico can't be taking pieces off of the chessboard and denying these western corporatists from controlling their energy sector.
Legal matters are handled by the government. When the courts grant you no remedy what is the next option?Land disputes are legal matters. They should be handled through the courts.
This is the risk of purchasing land without a robust legal system. Perhaps corporations would reconsider buying when there is no legal recourse.Legal matters are handled by the government. When the courts grant you no remedy what is the next option?
IMO that's when you up the ante. Not militarily mind you. But you must remind them what cards you hold and that you will use them.
The problem is this admin is considered very weak. And not very attentive.
It's not even just land. It's equipment and other property that is being essentially stolen.This is the risk of purchasing land without a robust legal system. Perhaps corporations would reconsider buying when there is no legal recourse.
I support our government doing what they can. But our constitution doesn't protect our citizens from other governments; it protects our citizens from our government.It's not even just land. It's equipment and other property that is being essentially stolen.
I agree it's a risk. But at some point your government must stand for you. We desperately need strong, competent leadership.