MILO what happened to Boise State?

#1

VolBeef88

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 30, 2004
Messages
12,262
Likes
3
#1
I thought BSU was going to make it a good game? I guess if you are a UGA fan it was a good game. I think most of those MAC teams will get it handed to them if they play a SEC team. The BSU qb had a bad game because he has never faced this good of a D. If he faced it more often he would be better at it but he does not. Just a fact. You could tell he was out of whack early and often. So was the BSU D. They made Shokley look like a super star.
 
#2
#2
Boise State showed everyone that they can beat up on WAC teams but not on SEC teams...They don't have the talent to compete with any of the upper tier SEC teams.
 
#3
#3
Hey everyone thought it was going to be a good game, not just Milo. The media, milo, Me, and a whole bunch of other fans thought it was going to be close. Georgia proved us all wrong, but did you see that QB yesterday? what the hell was that all about?
 
#4
#4
I heard something about heat exhaustion, but I don't know. It was maybe the worst half that I've ever seen a QB have.
 
#5
#5
I think he was confused by the green field.....
 
#8
#8
I feel sory for that poor quarterback. He has GOT to be better than how he played yesterday.
 
#9
#9
Originally posted by LadyinOrange@Sep 4, 2005 2:00 PM
I feel sory for that poor quarterback. He has GOT to be better than how he played yesterday.
[snapback]136139[/snapback]​


I think YOU may be better than the way he played yesterday.
 
#10
#10
Originally posted by Orangewhiteblood@Sep 4, 2005 12:54 PM
I think he was confused by the green field.....
[snapback]136131[/snapback]​



:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
 
#11
#11
Originally posted by VolBeef88@Sep 4, 2005 8:24 AM
I thought BSU was going to make it a good game? I guess if you are a UGA fan it was a good game. I think most of those MAC teams will get it handed to them if they play a SEC team. The BSU qb had a bad game because he has never faced this good of a D. If he faced it more often he would be better at it but he does not. Just a fact. You could tell he was out of whack early and often. So was the BSU D. They made Shokley look like a super star.
[snapback]136015[/snapback]​

:lol: Come on buddy, you didn't even get the conference right. Gotta flip that M around, it's the WAC. Anyways, the others were right, I think the majority of the nation was shocked by how the game turned out. I don't know what happened to Zabransky, but maybe the stars were misaligned for Oregon quarterbacks that day (Zabransky and Ainge being from Oregon).

That was easily the worst game I've seen Zabransky play though. His NFL stock just took a nose-dive. Definitley not the same team from last season's Liberty Bowl.
 
#12
#12
BSU played bad and UGA played VERY well and capitalized on their mistakes....That's why that game was as big of a blow out as it was....BSU made Shockley look like a God yesterday because of how bad they played....We'll see how good the Dawgs are next week when Spurrier comes to town
 
#14
#14
Originally posted by milohimself@Sep 4, 2005 3:05 PM
They will still look good. South Carolina may very well be the least-talented team in the SEC.
[snapback]136268[/snapback]​

That'd be Vandy......Carolina has some players over there, they've just been poorly coached
 
#16
#16
I don't understand why Spurrier came back. I thought he had the all-time best SEC winning %? He can say goodbye to that

And after all the problems, crappy recruiting and cuts, I'd say that Vandy might just have more talent than SoCar this year.
 
#17
#17
Originally posted by milohimself@Sep 4, 2005 3:08 PM
I don't understand why Spurrier came back. I thought he had the all-time best SEC winning %? He can say goodbye to that

And after all the problems, crappy recruiting and cuts, I'd say that Vandy might just have more talent than SoCar this year.
[snapback]136272[/snapback]​

The only players that play at Vandy that could make it anywhere else IMO is Cutler and their HB.....I can't remember his name....But those are probably the only two on the roster that could go somewhere and a good amount of playing time.

Spurrier, I don't think he had the best all-time winnin %....I think that's Fulmer...They showed it yesterday on the TV and said Fulmer had it but by a very slim margin...Course that was over the past 10 years...So I don't know if Spurrier has him beat from before that but over the past 10 years CPF has it
 
#18
#18
No, that stat yesterday was winningest active coaches with ten or more years experience.

I remember hearing some stat that Spurrier has the best all-time winning % over SEC teams, including Bear, General, etc. Wouldn't suprise me.
 
#19
#19
Originally posted by milohimself@Sep 4, 2005 3:20 PM
No, that stat yesterday was winningest active coaches with ten or more years experience.

I remember hearing some stat that Spurrier has the best all-time winning % over SEC teams, including Bear, General, etc. Wouldn't suprise me.
[snapback]136278[/snapback]​

Oh if he does, I wouldn't be in the least bit surprised....He had some killer teams at Florida when he was down there.....Either way, that's goin down the drain while he's at South Carolina
 
#20
#20
Originally posted by vols2345@Sep 4, 2005 12:51 PM
Hey everyone thought it was going to be a good game,  not just Milo.  The media,  milo, Me, and a whole bunch of other fans thought it was going to be close.  Georgia proved us all wrong,  but did you see that QB yesterday?  what the hell was that all about?
[snapback]136128[/snapback]​


Yes they did 2354. The media loves the mid majors. I remember a few years back BSU finished in the top 25 after being trounced by the Razorbacks. That was the only big school they played and the only one they lost. BSU finished in the top 25 and the razorbacks did not. The SEC is a much different place than they are used to.
 
#21
#21
Originally posted by milohimself@Sep 4, 2005 2:11 PM
:lol: Come on buddy, you didn't even get the conference right. Gotta flip that M around, it's the WAC. Anyways, the others were right, I think the majority of the nation was shocked by how the game turned out. I don't know what happened to Zabransky, but maybe the stars were misaligned for Oregon quarterbacks that day (Zabransky and Ainge being from Oregon).

That was easily the worst game I've seen Zabransky play though. His NFL stock just took a nose-dive. Definitley not the same team from last season's Liberty Bowl.
[snapback]136197[/snapback]​


I meant WAC, my bad. But that is also the best D he has faced and the best D they have faced since they went to Little Rock and faced another SEC team in the Hogs. There is a gap in talent, period.
 
#22
#22
Yep. UGA played great but Boise gave them the game as well... Zabransky has nobody to blame for those turnovers but himself. He could have evaded and made better decisions but he did not. Zabransky had a terrible game and the rest of the team went down soon afterwards.
 
#23
#23
MILO the speed and power of the game at the SEC level is something that kid could not have practiced for. I think he was overwhelmed. Could he have played better? Yes but I don't thnk BSU gave anything. I (as much as it paines me to say anything good about them) the dogs took the game. Yes the kid played bad, but they made him play bad. I have seen it over and again when midmajors from the WAC or else where play SEC teams (out side UK and Vandy) they are almost always overwhelmed.
 
#24
#24
I was watching the game... Zabransky didn't have too much pressure to deal with most of the time at the beginning... I don't know why but he just threw the game away. Boise could have made the game closer if they wanted to, they just didn't show up and Georgia took advantage of it.
 

VN Store



Back
Top