Missouri to remain in the Big XII

#1

SportsFreak

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2010
Messages
336
Likes
6
#1
Kentucky Sports Radio is reporting that Missouri's Chancellor conducted a press conference today stating that Missouri will remain in the Big XII. Don't have a link to this yet but I'm searching for one. Here is a quote from the article:

" This will be your only conference realignment note and we’ll move quickly, I promise. I’m just as sick of it as you are. Two days after the Birmingham News reported that Missouri had “informally” agreed to join the Southeastern Conference, the schools’ chancellor held a press conference and said the Tigers are committed to remaining in the Big 12."
 
#2
#2
Bring in WVU and call it a day. 14 is good enough for now.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#4
#4
well yeah kentucky says that but then last night:

Mizzou won't commit to Big 12, SEC still an option - KansasCity.com

The fractured Big 12 Conference attempted to join hands and unify Thursday night, but Missouri’s grip may not be as tight.

Not only did MU chancellor Brady Deaton and athletic director Mike Alden decline to confirm the university’s commitment in the long or short term to the Big 12, the Tigers’ interest in the Southeastern Conference is very much alive.

“We either stick in the Big 12 because everything came about the way it needs to, the right way, with all the differences being settled in Missouri’s favor,” a university administrator who asked not to be identified told The Star on Thursday night. “But what are the odds of that happening?

“The other option is to join another conference and I believe that is something that we’re very open to.”

The Star first reported earlier this week that Missouri had an informal offer from the Southeastern Conference to join should the Big 12 not remain a viable home.

In a brief news conference in a first-floor room at Jesse Hall on Thursday night, Deaton said that as chairman of the Big 12 Board of Directors he was intent on making needed changes to the conference. But Deaton stressed he was first responsible to the University of Missouri.

When asked if falling short of those changes that Missouri might exit the Big 12, Deaton said:

“That’s again a hypothetical that could occur. In a sense anything is possible. That’s all recognized and that’s what has led to the discussions that we’ve had over the last several weeks.”

When asked about the SEC, Deaton said that was another hypothetical and he wouldn’t elaborate further.

Asked if the SEC was still in play, the administrator, who contacted The Star, said: “You will not look stupid by insinuating that.”

The mood in Columbia contrasted starkly with a news conference held around the same time by Oklahoma president David Boren, athletic director Joe Castiglione, football coach Bob Stoops and other officials in Norman.

There, Boren detailed the desire to reach agreement on all nine schools granting their first- and second-tier TV rights to the Big 12 for a six-year period and stated there was conference-wide unity in that effort.

Under the plan, each school’s revenue for its games broadcast on ABC/ESPN, the Big 12’s first-tier TV rights holder, and Fox Sports Net, the second-tier rights holder, would go to the Big 12 for equal distribution.

“These are very strong handcuffs,” Boren said. “When you grant your rights it’s very unlikely you would receive an invitation to another conference.”

Deaton also acknowledged the board was pursuing revenue sharing and also said an expansion committee was reactivated, a move that opens the way for what would be a nine-member conference next school year to add members, perhaps up to a restoration of 12 teams.

“As chair,” he said, “I was asked to form a special working group to address a variety of other issues to further strengthen conference stability.”

Deaton was asked why fans should believe the Big 12 could unify after the departures of Nebraska and Colorado last year, Texas A&M next year, and with Oklahoma, Oklahoma State, Texas Tech, Texas and Missouri speculated for possible departure to other conferences.

“We know there’re a number of specific issues to be addressed,” Deaton said, “and I think the public generally is aware of what a number of those are.

“Be assured that there will be a working group immediately set in motion to address that range of issues.”

Deaton would not respond to a question about what concessions the University of Texas may or may not make in the areas of revenue sharing. Texas’ $247 million Longhorn Network venture with ESPN falls under third-tier rights, which are not shared, and has caused concern among coaches because it planned to show high school football games.

Asked again if Deaton was prepared to make a statement that Missouri would remain in the Big 12 for the foreseeable future, Deaton said:

“The University of Missouri is going to continue to work for what is best for the University of Missouri.

“We have seen that aligned with the Big 12 Conference.”

The Missouri administrator who asked not to be identified told The Star that Deaton’s statement should be construed as less than an unconditional commitment to the Big 12 at this time.

As Deaton left the room, Alden took questions in the hall of the school’s administration building for a little over seven minutes.

Hit right away with the question of whether Missouri was committed long term to staying in the Big 12, Alden said he would not attempt to speak for Deaton.

On Wednesday, in an interview on KFNS radio in St. Louis, Missouri football coach Gary Pinkel criticized the Big 12 for not fixing the problems that have thrown the league’s viability into question for the last year and a half.

“In my opinion, it’s going to go on and on and on and it’s not a whole lot of fun to be part of it,” Pinkel said, adding that the situation was “embarrassing.”

“His term was embarrassing, mine was its challenging, it’s troubling,” Alden said. “You don’t want your league out there being talked about the way that the Big 12 had been talked about for the last two weeks, three weeks, year, year and a half.”

Alden also addressed Missouri and other schools in the Big 12 having spoken to other conferences.

“Over the course of the last several months, or month … people were calling people all over the country …,” he said.

“It’s almost like recruiting. If you’re a pretty good student athlete, people kind of know who you are. … For us, like Brady said and probably everybody else in the country, the issue there was just talking to people and getting pulses on things.”
 
#5
#5
point probably being here...a bit more of a story's needed (either way) before anyone begins to claim one thing or another.

There were a bunch of "Mizzou says no to the SEC" stories last night that got shot down an hour or so later

...whole lot of speculation on weak leads been going on here
 
Last edited:
#6
#6
I say we rescind TAMU's offer and just stick with 12. But I'm not in charge and no one cares what I think :)
 
#7
#7
Bring in WVU and call it a day. 14 is good enough for now.
Posted via VolNation Mobile

I vote yes!! Only b/c it brings sec play into my backyard and I can go watch every weekend!!
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#12
#12
I say we rescind TAMU's offer and just stick with 12. But I'm not in charge and no one cares what I think :)

I wish we would do this. It'd be funny to see TAMU go back to the B12 with their tail between their legs.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#15
#15
If the SEC can't get one of its top options for #14 this year, I think they should stick with 13 for now, because we've seen how much things can change from one summer to the next. Don't start filling "vacancies" just because we can.
 
#18
#18
Someone said in another thread that Slive is meeting with VT today!

Actually, thats what the KSR report went on to say. Not necessarily that Slive was meeting with VT, but that he was interested in them and we should expect them to be the next target school. Was the 20m buyout put into place immediately or will there be a period of time before that bylaw is put into place? If so, bolting from the ACC might be a lot easier. At first I did NOT want VA Tech. But with a limited number of teams left, they are looking more and more attractive.
 
#19
#19
Actually, thats what the KSR report went on to say. Not necessarily that Slive was meeting with VT, but that he was interested in them and we should expect them to be the next target school. Was the 20m buyout put into place immediately or will there be a period of time before that bylaw is put into place? If so, bolting from the ACC might be a lot easier. At first I did NOT want VA Tech. But with a limited number of teams left, they are looking more and more attractive.

They are equal or better than literally everyone but Oklahoma.
 
#20
#20
It'd be funny to see TAMU go back to the B12 with their tail between their legs.

I guess I'm missing your point. Please explain if you would....thanks.

Let's say A&M doesn't get to go to the SEC, and they have to go back to the Big 12. Would anyone, who now knows the truth about the University of Texas and their LHN, think A&M should be ashamed of themselves for their actions? I guess I'm not following your logic.

I know there are tons of traditionalists on this board that want the SEC to stay at 12 teams. I have no arguments against you. But I fail to see how A&M's actions in light of all that's gone on of late qualify them for 'tail-between-their-legs' status.
 
#21
#21
I guess I'm missing your point. Please explain if you would....thanks.

Let's say A&M doesn't get to go to the SEC, and they have to go back to the Big 12. Would anyone, who now knows the truth about the University of Texas and their LHN, think A&M should be ashamed of themselves for their actions? I guess I'm not following your logic.

I know there are tons of traditionalists on this board that want the SEC to stay at 12 teams. I have no arguments against you. But I fail to see how A&M's actions in light of all that's gone on of late qualify them for 'tail-between-their-legs' status.
Wasn't a&m going to be in the SEC before the season started?
 
#22
#22
I guess I'm missing your point. Please explain if you would....thanks.

Let's say A&M doesn't get to go to the SEC, and they have to go back to the Big 12. Would anyone, who now knows the truth about the University of Texas and their LHN, think A&M should be ashamed of themselves for their actions? I guess I'm not following your logic.

I know there are tons of traditionalists on this board that want the SEC to stay at 12 teams. I have no arguments against you. But I fail to see how A&M's actions in light of all that's gone on of late qualify them for 'tail-between-their-legs' status.

I think he was meaning it would be more of a "I'm sorry for betraying you, Big XII. Will you please accept me back?" type of tail between the legs.
 
#23
#23
so OU came out last night / this morning saying everyone in the big 12 agreed to the new proposal (big 12 owns all the teams' TV rights until the next contract expires)

and the Missouri president and AD comes out last night saying:

“We either stick in the Big 12 because everything came about the way it needs to, the right way, with all the differences being settled in Missouri’s favor,” a university administrator who asked not to be identified told The Star on Thursday night. “But what are the odds of that happening?

“The other option is to join another conference and I believe that is something that we’re very open to.”

When asked if falling short of those changes that Missouri might exit the Big 12, Deaton said:

“That’s again a hypothetical that could occur. In a sense anything is possible. That’s all recognized and that’s what has led to the discussions that we’ve had over the last several weeks.”

When asked about the SEC, Deaton said that was another hypothetical and he wouldn’t elaborate further.

Asked if the SEC was still in play, the administrator, who contacted The Star, said: “You will not look stupid by insinuating that.”

though the conversation/article ended with:

Asked again if Deaton was prepared to make a statement that Missouri would remain in the Big 12 for the foreseeable future, Deaton said:

“The University of Missouri is going to continue to work for what is best for the University of Missouri.

“We have seen that aligned with the Big 12 Conference.”

The Missouri administrator who asked not to be identified told The Star that Deaton’s statement should be construed as less than an unconditional commitment to the Big 12 at this time.


It looks like there's still somewhat of a mess brewing up there - between some of these teams not so keen on the "TV rights belong to the Big 12 regardless" idea and that apparently - while the tier 1 and tier 2 rights of television are locked up - tier 3 (i.e. the longhorn network) is left untouched is upsetting some making these decisions

Then SI gives us this

Deaton did not go nearly as far as Boren. He said the nine CEOs had agreed to discuss such a move, but he said they had not agreed upon it yet. Deaton also refused to commit to keeping Missouri -- which flirted with the SEC in recent weeks -- in the conference long-term. Asked Thursday if the Tigers could leave if the Big 12 couldn't work out its issues, Deaton told reporters, "That's a hypothetical that could occur."


Despite Big 12 agreement, Missouri keeping SEC as option - NCAA Football - Sporting News

Big 12 conference tries to come together after near breakup - Andy Staples - SI.com

Alabama | MrSEC.com

PowerMizzou.com - Tigers talk but say little

Deaton said some of those issues have been aired publicly and others have not. After standing in on Deaton's press conference, Mizzou Athletic Director Mike Alden was asked if it was accurate to say tonight marked the beginning of a process with no resolutions rather than the end of that process.

"I think that would be safe to say," Alden said. "I think there's a lot of work to be done."

Given repeated opportunities to confirm that Missouri would be a member of the Big 12 for the long-term, neither Deaton nor Alden exactly did so.

(which also reported that while AD Mike Alden says everyone at MU is on the same page, “there are numerous people in positions of power at Missouri that strongly want to leave the Big 12.”)



There's a lot not being said or adding up quite yet...I don't know what to think this "Big 12 is saved" notion when OU comes out and says it's all good and then another member university's president comes out saying "no, we didn't all agree on anything". Then again, this talk could all just be Missouri using rumors of an SEC invite as leverage
 
#24
#24
I don't think any of this means Missouri is leaving or any such thing....but there's still a big mess over there....especially if they're refusing to publicly state to the media "we're in the big 12 for the long haul"

It's pretty much turned into ESPN and CBS reporting OU's word over missouri's though



The SEC is probably moving to talk to someone else....but I'm not so sure any of this has amounted to any sort of declaration of being off the table or such


edit: apparently though there will be a missouri press conference this evening
 

VN Store



Back
Top