DowntownVol
Stylin' and Profilin'
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2005
- Messages
- 2,563
- Likes
- 808
(1) I think Lexvol already rather eloquently covered this, but it bears repeating: when you can win a game against a good (but admittedly not great) team when ALL the breaks go against you - penalties, turnovers, officiating - you have a VERY good football team on your hands.
(2) We will not beat Arkansas (scariest team left on the schedule, IMO - in fact, I fear the Evil Genius and Co. more than LSU at this point) or LSU without rushing for more than 100 yards. If Coker is seriously injured, Foster's going to have to step it up. I respectfully disagree with Lexvol on the whole "I'm cool with running four wide from the shotgun all year" thing - against decent to good defenses, you HAVE to run the ball to keep the defense honest. Even if you're getting stuffed a bit in the first half.. running the ball always gets easier late in the game. Throwing all the time negates the clock-burning luxuries of playing with a lead, also. (when you have one, which we didn't today, obviously.) I certainly don't want a 2:1 ratio of passes to runs vs. the Hawgs and Bayou Bengals.
(3) If it's gotten to the point where we have to use running backs to return punts and kickoffs, so be it. That was the best return game we've had in a while, and most importantly, no fumbles. I don't blame CPF for rolling the dice on the possibility of injuries - isn't that why we have 3 tailbacks who can start? Which reminds me: where was Hardesty in this game?
(4) Okay, so Ainge had a bad first half. He's fine. Let's not get our collective panties in a wad about this. If he doesn't make the play on the interception return, we probably lose 17-16. He looked sharp and poised on the game-winning drive. Would you have rather him have a spectacular first half, then choke in the clutch? No.
(5) I hate to bring this up, but the more wins we rack up, the more blowing the lead vs. Florida pi**es me off.
You guys are the best. Always good to read posts from knowledgeable, classy fellow Big Orange fans. I'll try to hang out here more often.
GO VOLS!
dtv
(2) We will not beat Arkansas (scariest team left on the schedule, IMO - in fact, I fear the Evil Genius and Co. more than LSU at this point) or LSU without rushing for more than 100 yards. If Coker is seriously injured, Foster's going to have to step it up. I respectfully disagree with Lexvol on the whole "I'm cool with running four wide from the shotgun all year" thing - against decent to good defenses, you HAVE to run the ball to keep the defense honest. Even if you're getting stuffed a bit in the first half.. running the ball always gets easier late in the game. Throwing all the time negates the clock-burning luxuries of playing with a lead, also. (when you have one, which we didn't today, obviously.) I certainly don't want a 2:1 ratio of passes to runs vs. the Hawgs and Bayou Bengals.
(3) If it's gotten to the point where we have to use running backs to return punts and kickoffs, so be it. That was the best return game we've had in a while, and most importantly, no fumbles. I don't blame CPF for rolling the dice on the possibility of injuries - isn't that why we have 3 tailbacks who can start? Which reminds me: where was Hardesty in this game?
(4) Okay, so Ainge had a bad first half. He's fine. Let's not get our collective panties in a wad about this. If he doesn't make the play on the interception return, we probably lose 17-16. He looked sharp and poised on the game-winning drive. Would you have rather him have a spectacular first half, then choke in the clutch? No.
(5) I hate to bring this up, but the more wins we rack up, the more blowing the lead vs. Florida pi**es me off.
You guys are the best. Always good to read posts from knowledgeable, classy fellow Big Orange fans. I'll try to hang out here more often.
GO VOLS!
dtv