Murdoch now issuing apologies and Wall Street journal former owner and staff respond.

#1

PoochPunt3rdDown

Boom. +14. Moby Dick.
Joined
Jan 6, 2010
Messages
29,218
Likes
21
#1
Here's the full article.

Rupert Murdoch phone-hacking scandal: US connections grow - Yahoo! News

I found the following portion to be very revealing.

"If I had known what I know now, I would have pushed harder against" the Murdoch bid, said Christopher Bancroft, a member of the family which controlled Dow Jones & Company, publishers of The Wall Street Journal.

It’s been a difficult time for Wall Street Journal staffers.

“In the last week and a half, reporters and editors at the august Journal have had to come to terms with the fact that they share corporate DNA with publications that have paid police for news, paid large settlements to keep phone-hacking victims quiet, and provided Parliament with incomplete information, among other sins against journalism,” writes Newsweek senior writer Nick Summers in the Daily Beast.

Questions have been raised about the Journal’s coverage of the scandal, including its interview with Murdoch in which the questioning seemed anything but aggressive.

New York Times columnist Joe Nocera – who back in 2007 wrote approvingly of Murdoch’s takeover of the Wall Street Journal – takes a tougher line, charging that the Journal “has been Fox-ified.”

Under Mr. Hinton’s direction as publisher, Nocera writes, “Soon came the changes, swift and sure: shorter articles, less depth, an increased emphasis on politics and, weirdly, sometimes surprisingly unsophisticated coverage of business.”

“Along with the transformation of a great paper into a mediocre one came a change that was both more subtle and more insidious. The political articles grew more and more slanted toward the Republican party line,” Nocera writes. “The Journal was turned into a propaganda vehicle for its owner’s conservative views.”

That may seem unduly harsh, a reflection (as Nocera writes) of his own mea culpa.

But there’s no doubt that Murdoch’s influence in the United States has been considerable.

“Over the past decade, Murdoch and his company News Corp. have spent close to $50 million sowing the seeds of goodwill here in America through well-heeled lobbyists, seven-figure political donations, and large charitable contributions to key nonprofit groups,” writes Daily Beast reporter Laura Colarusso. “Murdoch’s money trail can be traced deep into the halls of Congress and the powerful federal agencies overseeing the industry that has made him wealthy.”

If it is true that some "journalists" hacked into the wireless phones of 9/11 victims, who do you think should be held accountable?
 
#2
#2
Murdoch buys off politicians mainly Republicans? Who'da thunk it?
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#3
#3
Murdoch buys off politicians mainly Republicans? Who'da thunk it?
Posted via VolNation Mobile

and George Soros buys off democrats. It stinks regardless of the agenda, but don't think for a second that this is something out of the ordinary.
 
#4
#4
and George Soros buys off democrats. It stinks regardless of the agenda, but don't think for a second that this is something out of the ordinary.

MG1968 kills my politics forum posting, because more or less I'd echo.

Rupert has his angle, but to pretend that Soros isn't pulling strings on the other side is asinine.
 
#5
#5
MG1968 kills my politics forum posting, because more or less I'd echo.

Rupert has his angle, but to pretend that Soros isn't pulling strings on the other side is asinine.

oh please, as if I will ever be able to equal the quality contained in the 10 thousand post lead you hold over me.
 
#6
#6
oh please, as if I will ever be able to equal the quality contained in the 10 thousand post lead you hold over me.

Hey, I'm a part timer on boards that involve thought. I have an easy 6,000 in the endzone.

But really, I don't feel as if I'm a donkey when i post in Politics.
 
#8
#8
It's kind of scary when you give some actual thought to how much sway Murdoch and Soros have over politics on both sides of the pond. Well, had, for Murdoch.
 
#10
#10
It's kind of scary when you give some actual thought to how much sway Murdoch and Soros have over politics on both sides of the pond. Well, had, for Murdoch.

Heard that David Cameron is having to reveal to Parliament the depth of his association with Murdoch. The statement was made that Murdoch media empire makes or breaks a PM based on how they report on them.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#11
#11
and George Soros buys off democrats. It stinks regardless of the agenda, but don't think for a second that this is something out of the ordinary.

Come on MG. You gotta throw a Dem into everything. The post was sarcastic. I am well aware that their are sugar daddys on both sides. This particular thread was about Murdoch; thus, my comments addressed him.

Once again, this tit for tat is as bad as the 'it's all Bush's fault' people. It's the, 'yeah but Obama/Dems do this' crowd. People are becoming what they once despised.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#12
#12
Murdoch is in deep trouble. It will be interesting to see what Fox does with this as details emerge. I don't get the pression that Murdoch will tolerate much criticism from people who work for him.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#13
#13
Murdoch is in deep trouble. It will be interesting to see what Fox does with this as details emerge. I don't get the pression that Murdoch will tolerate much criticism from people who work for him.
Posted via VolNation Mobile

not sure what you mean, FNC has been covering the story just as much as other news outlets albeit without any unnecessary editorializing
 

VN Store



Back
Top