Big Orange 1
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2009
- Messages
- 923
- Likes
- 5
The same way that UGA got away with a pass interference call against Missouri on that screen/touchdown pass to Washington. The UGA defender was practically hanging onto the guy in the end zone and the referee, standing right there, did not call it. Meanwhile last week, UT had good coverage in the end zone against UGA and they flagged us for blanketing the receiver. The guy was covered! Get over it. Referees slant their calls in favor of the better teams in the SEC. That's my opinion.
The same way that UGA got away with a pass interference call against Missouri on that screen/touchdown pass to Washington. The UGA defender was practically hanging onto the guy in the end zone and the referee, standing right there, did not call it. Meanwhile last week, UT had good coverage in the end zone against UGA and they flagged us for blanketing the receiver. The guy was covered! Get over it. Referees slant their calls in favor of the better teams in the SEC. That's my opinion.
The same way that UGA got away with a pass interference call against Missouri on that screen/touchdown pass to Washington. The UGA defender was practically hanging onto the guy in the end zone and the referee, standing right there, did not call it. Meanwhile last week, UT had good coverage in the end zone against UGA and they flagged us for blanketing the receiver. The guy was covered! Get over it. Referees slant their calls in favor of the better teams in the SEC. That's my opinion.
The same way that UGA got away with a pass interference call against Missouri on that screen/touchdown pass to Washington. The UGA defender was practically hanging onto the guy in the end zone and the referee, standing right there, did not call it. Meanwhile last week, UT had good coverage in the end zone against UGA and they flagged us for blanketing the receiver. The guy was covered! Get over it. Referees slant their calls in favor of the better teams in the SEC. That's my opinion.