My current Recruiting Rankings

#1

hampdawgg

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 12, 2006
Messages
425
Likes
0
#1
Method for Ranking
Had to have an avg. * ranking of 3.3 or above on Rivals
Had to have at least 10 commits
6.1 = 10pts, 6.0 = 9 pts, 5.9 = 8pts, etc.
Took the above number/team and divided by the number of commits
Re-scored for kickers - top 5 = 5.8, next 5 = 5.7, next 5 =5.6, etc.

1. USC - 8.0
Commits - 13
2. Texas - 7.19
Commits - 21
3. Florida - 7.15
Commits - 20
4. Penn State - 7
Commits - 20
5. Georgia - 6.99
Commits - 19
6. Tennessee - 6.90
Commits - 21
7. California - 6.71
Commits - 14
8. Alabama - 6.70
Commits - 23
9. Oklahoma - 6.41
Commits - 27
10. UCLA - 6.41
Commits - 17
11. LSU - 6.39
Commits - 24
12. Notre Dame - 6.28
Commits - 18
13. Oregon - 6.26
Commits - 15
14. Ohio State - 6.26
Commits - 15
15. Auburn - 6.23
Commits - 26
16. Texas A&M - 6
Commits - 22
17. Georgia Tech - 5.92
Commits - 13
 
Last edited:
#3
#3
Hamp unfortunately for you I think you will lose some of the guys you have currently that you love most, and you will lose them to TN.

Then we will lose Lance Thompson and hire to replace him Mr. Garner. Ed O will leave to be a HC somewhere, Monte will retire and Garner will be D Cord. Or Garner will just study under Monte and get a resume that people do not laugh at because he will learn under someone who does not almost cost his HC their job.
 
#5
#5
Hamp unfortunately for you I think you will lose some of the guys you have currently that you love most, and you will lose them to TN.

Then we will lose Lance Thompson and hire to replace him Mr. Garner. Ed O will leave to be a HC somewhere, Monte will retire and Garner will be D Cord. Or Garner will just study under Monte and get a resume that people do not laugh at because he will learn under someone who does not almost cost his HC their job.

Im not a bulldog. I graduated from UT.
 

VN Store



Back
Top