that was successful, where the coach didn't have close ties to the University?
Think about that for a little while guys. What conclusions can one draw from that?
At this point, hire Fulmer if he can bring Chavis with him. We as fans are screwed at this point. To me, this is absolutely rock bottom. I can't comprehend how this got to this situation. I'm 100% dumbfounded.
Robert Neyland
Neyland was an assistant the year before he became a head coach.
I'm not making any definitive conclusions. All i'm saying is take a look at the past. We haven't gone out and stolen a coach that had no ties to this area that turned out well.
Reading the threads, I just wonder if any everyone believes that we are in a different time in college football or that we have always done it this way.
We haven't gone out and solen a coach period except for Kiffin and Dooley, and only Dooley can be sufficiently evaluated. You have no point here.
At this point, hire Fulmer if he can bring Chavis with him. We as fans are screwed at this point. To me, this is absolutely rock bottom. I can't comprehend how this got to this situation. I'm 100% dumbfounded.
Neyland was an assistant the year before he became a head coach.
I'm not making any definitive conclusions. All i'm saying is take a look at the past. We haven't gone out and stolen a coach that had no ties to this area that turned out well.
Reading the threads, I just wonder if any everyone believes that we are in a different time in college football or that we have always done it this way.
Sheep. Read what I was saying. I've already stated that as a fact. That is reality. What I'm saying is that many on this board need to reflect a little more on what this program is all about, where it came from, the way it's been done. Stop following the crowd and acting like this is a coaching job just like every other.
I'm sure most Vol fans would love to have a UT guy if there was one but other then Fulmer there's just not anyone else right now. Is there?